Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Neurodegeneration (Mar 2026)
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Getting peptide vaccines to work: just a matter of quality control?
Esteban Celis
Esteban Celis
View: Text | PDF
Commentary

Getting peptide vaccines to work: just a matter of quality control?

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Commentary

Authors

Esteban Celis

×

Figure 2

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Possible mechanisms to explain how exogenous peptides could be processed...
Possible mechanisms to explain how exogenous peptides could be processed to form MHC class I–binding peptides, some of which may constitute cryptic epitopes. Peptides derived from a vaccine (step 1) could be cleaved by serum proteases (SP) (step 2) or cell surface proteases (CSP) on the APC (step 3) to form products capable of binding to cell surface MHC class I molecules that are temporarily empty. Alternatively, the exogenously added peptide representing the minimal CTL epitope may bind to surface MHCmolecules by displacing endogenously-bound peptides (step 4). Endocytosed peptides (step 5) may be cleaved by resident proteases (P) in endosomal compartments (EC) or may gain access to the cytoplasm (step 7) where proteasomes (PS) may cleave them. The cytoplasmic peptides gain access to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) through the action of the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) (step 8). Once in the ER, peptides may be additionally trimmed by resident aminopeptidases (AP), where they bind to empty MHC class I molecules (step 9). The peptide/MHC complexes travel via the Golgi apparatus (step 10) to the cell surface, where they are exposed to T cell interactions (step 11). Peptides that are endocytosed can also bind to MHC class I molecules that recycle through ECs (step 13) to the cell surface (step 14).

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts