Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • ASCI Milestone Awards
    • Video Abstracts
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Clinical innovation and scientific progress in GLP-1 medicine (Nov 2025)
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • ASCI Milestone Awards
  • Video Abstracts
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Profound MEK inhibitor response in a cutaneous melanoma harboring a GOLGA4-RAF1 fusion
Christopher R. McEvoy, Huiling Xu, Kortnye Smith, Dariush Etemadmoghadam, Huei San Leong, David Y. Choong, David J. Byrne, Amir Iravani, Sophie Beck, Linda Mileshkin, Richard W. Tothill, David D. Bowtell, Bindi M. Bates, Violeta Nastevski, Judy Browning, Anthony H. Bell, Chloe Khoo, Jayesh Desai, Andrew P. Fellowes, Stephen B. Fox, Owen W.J. Prall
Christopher R. McEvoy, Huiling Xu, Kortnye Smith, Dariush Etemadmoghadam, Huei San Leong, David Y. Choong, David J. Byrne, Amir Iravani, Sophie Beck, Linda Mileshkin, Richard W. Tothill, David D. Bowtell, Bindi M. Bates, Violeta Nastevski, Judy Browning, Anthony H. Bell, Chloe Khoo, Jayesh Desai, Andrew P. Fellowes, Stephen B. Fox, Owen W.J. Prall
View: Text | PDF
Concise Communication Genetics Oncology

Profound MEK inhibitor response in a cutaneous melanoma harboring a GOLGA4-RAF1 fusion

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

The serine/threonine kinases BRAF and CRAF are critical components of the MAPK signaling pathway that is activated in many cancer types. In approximately 1% of melanomas, BRAF or CRAF is activated through structural arrangements. We describe a metastatic melanoma with a GOLGA4-RAF1 fusion and pathogenic variants in catenin β 1 (CTNNB1) and cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A). Anti–cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4/anti–programmed cell death 1 (anti-CTLA4/anti–PD-1) combination immunotherapy failed to control tumor progression. In the absence of other actionable variants, the patient was administered MEK inhibitor therapy on the basis of its potential action against RAF1 fusions. This resulted in a profound and clinically significant response. We demonstrated that GOLGA4-RAF1 expression was associated with ERK activation, elevated expression of the RAS/RAF downstream coeffector ETV5, and a high Ki67 index. These findings provide a rationale for the dramatic response to targeted therapy. This study shows that molecular characterization of treatment-resistant cancers can identify therapeutic targets and personalize therapy management, leading to improved patient outcomes.

Authors

Christopher R. McEvoy, Huiling Xu, Kortnye Smith, Dariush Etemadmoghadam, Huei San Leong, David Y. Choong, David J. Byrne, Amir Iravani, Sophie Beck, Linda Mileshkin, Richard W. Tothill, David D. Bowtell, Bindi M. Bates, Violeta Nastevski, Judy Browning, Anthony H. Bell, Chloe Khoo, Jayesh Desai, Andrew P. Fellowes, Stephen B. Fox, Owen W.J. Prall

×

Figure 2

Clinical timeline for the patient, with maximum-intensity projection FDG-PET imaging times noted.

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Clinical timeline for the patient, with maximum-intensity projection FDG...
Maximum-intensity projection (MIP) FDG-PET (MIP PET) images show a profound clinical response after MEKi treatment. Day 57: image shows baseline metastatic disease before MEKi treatment. Day 139: disease progression seen on follow-up study. Day 179 (17 days after MEKi): significant metabolic response. Day 216 (53 days after MEKi) and day 287 (124 days after MEKi): continued metabolic response. The maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) of a representative target lesion declined from 9.0 on day 139 (before MEKi) to 6.0 on day 179, to 4.2 on day 216, and to 1.8 on day 287. All FDG-avid metastatic sites are shown in red.

Copyright © 2026 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts