Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
CCR6-deficient mice have impaired leukocyte homeostasis and altered contact hypersensitivity and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses
Rosa Varona, … , Carlos Martínez-A., Gabriel Márquez
Rosa Varona, … , Carlos Martínez-A., Gabriel Márquez
Published March 15, 2001
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 2001;107(6):R37-R45. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI11297.
View: Text | PDF
Rapid Publication

CCR6-deficient mice have impaired leukocyte homeostasis and altered contact hypersensitivity and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

CCR6 expression in dendritic, T, and B cells suggests that this β-chemokine receptor may regulate the migration and recruitment of antigen-presenting and immunocompetent cells during inflammatory and immunological responses. Here we demonstrate that CCR6–/– mice have underdeveloped Peyer’s patches, in which the myeloid CD11b+ CD11c+ dendritic-cell subset is not present in the subepithelial dome. CCR6–/– mice also have increased numbers in T-cell subpopulations within the intestinal mucosa. In 2,4-dinitrofluorobenzene–induced contact hypersensitivity (CHS) studies, CCR6–/– mice developed more severe and more persistent inflammation than wild-type (WT) animals. Conversely, in a delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) model induced with allogeneic splenocytes, CCR6–/– mice developed no inflammatory response. The altered responses seen in the CHS and DTH assays suggest the existence of a defect in the activation and/or migration of the CD4+ T-cell subsets that downregulate or elicit the inflammation response, respectively. These findings underscore the role of CCR6 in cutaneous and intestinal immunity and the utility of CCR6–/– mice as a model to study pathologies in these tissues.

Authors

Rosa Varona, Ricardo Villares, Laura Carramolino, Íñigo Goya, Ángel Zaballos, Julio Gutiérrez, Miguel Torres, Carlos Martínez-A., Gabriel Márquez

×

Figure 5

Options: View larger image (or click on image) Download as PowerPoint
Altered response of CCR6–/– mice in contact hypersensitivity inflammatio...
Altered response of CCR6–/– mice in contact hypersensitivity inflammation. (a) CCR6–/– (n = 12; circles) and CCR6+/+ (n = 12; squares) mice were sensitized by epicutaneous application of 25 μl of 0.5% DNFB solution on the shaved abdomen. Increases in ear swelling were measured 24, 48, and 72 hours after challenge with 20 μl of 0.2% DNFB on the ears. Individual data and the mean value for each group are presented. Two-tailed t-test values for DNFB data: P = 0.006 (24 hours), P = 0.005 (48 hours), P = 0.002 (72 hours). (b) Similar number of lymph node cells in CCR6+/+ and CCR6–/– mice. Animals were sensitized with DNFB (filled bars) or left untreated (open bars); 5 days later, lymphocytes from IAB (I+A+B) LNs were prepared and counted. (c) CCR6–/– lymphocytes proliferate in response to specific and nonspecific stimuli. CCR6–/– and CCR6+/+ animals were sensitized with DNFB (filled symbols) or untreated (open symbols); 5 days later, cells from draining (I+A+B) or control mesenteric LNs were recovered and cultured for 36 hours alone or in the presence of DNBS, as indicated. Cultures were pulsed with 3H-thymidine for 18 hours, and cell proliferation was estimated. Similar experiments were performed to measure in vitro responses to a polyclonal stimulus, Con A. Each value represents the average of three separate groups, consisting of pooled LNs from two mice. All assays were performed in triplicate.

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts