Usage Information
Abstract
Autologous immune complex nephropathy (AICN), an experimental model for human membranous glomerulopathy, is characterized by marked heterogeneity in function from glomerulus to glomerulus. However, the fraction of the filtered load of fluid reabsorbed by the proximal tubule remains nearly constant from nephron to nephron, despite wide variation in single nephron glomerular filtration rate (SNGFR). To define the physiological mechanisms responsible for this marked variation in SNGFR values within a given kidney and for the remarkable preservation of glomerulotubular balance, the various determinants of fluid exchange across glomerular and peritubular capillary networks were evaluated in Munich-Wistar rats with AICN. For comparison, similar measurements were obtained in rats with the functionally more homogeneous lesion of heterologous immune complex nephropathy. In AICN rats studied ∼5 mo after injection of renal tubule epithelial antigen (Fx1A), a high degree of glomerulus-proximal tubule balance was found, despite marked variations in SNGFR values within a single kidney. These changes were associated with marked heterogeneity in immunoglobulin and complement deposition within and among glomeruli. Although mean capillary hydraulic pressure and Bowman's space hydraulic pressure ranged widely from glomerulus to glomerulus, the mean glomerular transcapillary hydraulic pressure difference was remarkably uniform among these functionally diverse glomeruli and could not, therefore, be implicated as the cause of the dispersion in SNGFR values. The two remaining determinants of SNGFR, namely, glomerular plasma flow rate (QA) and ultrafiltration coefficient (Kf), varied markedly from glomerulus to glomerulus, but always in direct proportion to SNGFR, and proved to be responsible for the marked variation in SNGFR.
Authors
I. Ichikawa, J. R. Hoyer, M. W. Seiler, B. M. Brenner
Usage data is cumulative from December 2024 through December 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 388 | 13 |
| 73 | 9 | |
| Scanned page | 580 | 8 |
| Citation downloads | 82 | 0 |
| Totals | 1,123 | 30 |
| Total Views | 1,153 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)