Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Free access | 10.1172/JCI110426

Urinary Concentration in the Papillary Collecting Duct of the Rat: ROLE OF THE URETER

Richard E. Oliver, Denis R. Roy, and Rex L. Jamison

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305

Find articles by Oliver, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305

Find articles by Roy, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California 94305

Find articles by Jamison, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published January 1, 1982 - More info

Published in Volume 69, Issue 1 on January 1, 1982
J Clin Invest. 1982;69(1):157–164. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110426.
© 1982 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published January 1, 1982 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Urine was observed to flow intermittently in the collecting ducts of the extrarenal papilla of antidiuretic rats. The purpose of this investigation was to test Reinking and Schmidt-Nielsen's hypothesis that intermittent flow plays an important role in the production of maximally concentrated urine. Samples of collecting duct fluid were obtained from the base and tip of the papilla by micropuncture through the intact ureter. Fluid osmolality rose sharply from base, 894±120 mosmol/kg H2O−1 (mean±SE), to tip, 1,667±114 (P<0.001), a distance of only 2 mm, and was due exclusively to reabsorption of water. After excision of the ureter, which abolished intermittent flow, osmolality fell modestly at the base to 723±82 mosmol/kg H2O−1 (P < 0.02), but strikingly at the tip to 1,012±103 (P < 0.001). The pelvic ureter was paralyzed by topical verapamil and dimethylsulfoxide, which abolished intermittent flow. Osmolality of urine at the tip was not changed (1,959±184 mosmol/kg H2O−1 before, vs. 1,957±126 after paralysis). The ureter was severed just beyond the papillary tip, a maneuver which preserved intermittent flow but abolished urinary reflux over the papilla. Urinary osmolality fell from 1,876±134 mosmol/kg H2O−1 to 1,284±115 (P < 0.005). These findings demonstrate that when the ureter is intact, over half of the increase in urinary osmolality above isotonicity occurs in the terminal one-fourth of the medullary collecting duct and is due exclusively to water reabsorption (no net solute addition). It is the continuity of the ureter, rather than intermittent flow due to ureteral peristalsis, which is essential for the formation of a maximally concentrated urine.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 157
page 157
icon of scanned page 158
page 158
icon of scanned page 159
page 159
icon of scanned page 160
page 160
icon of scanned page 161
page 161
icon of scanned page 162
page 162
icon of scanned page 163
page 163
icon of scanned page 164
page 164
Version history
  • Version 1 (January 1, 1982): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts