Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Free access | 10.1172/JCI110208

Selectivity of Dobutamine for Adrenergic Receptor Subtypes: IN VITRO ANALYSIS BY RADIOLIGAND BINDING

R. Sanders Williams and Timothy Bishop

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Cardiovascular Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Find articles by Williams, R. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Cardiovascular Division, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710

Find articles by Bishop, T. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Published June 1, 1981 - More info

Published in Volume 67, Issue 6 on June 1, 1981
J Clin Invest. 1981;67(6):1703–1711. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI110208.
© 1981 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published June 1, 1981 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

The cardiovascular responses elicited by dobutamine are distinctly different from those produced by other adrenergic or dopaminergic agonists. To test the hypothesis that dobutamine could have differential affinities for adrenergic receptor subtypes, and that such subtype selectivity could be related to its relatively unique pharmacologic properties, we assessed the ability of dobutamine to displace adrenergic radioligands from membrane receptors in a number of tissues of previously characterized adrenergic receptor subtype. For beta adrenergic receptors identified by (−) [3H]dihydroalprenolol (DHA), dobutamine had significantly greater affinity for the β1 subtype (KD = 2.5 μM in rat heart and 2.6 μM in turkey erythrocyte) than for the β2 subtype (KD = 14.8 μM in frog heart and 25.4 μM in rat lung) (P < 0.001). For alpha adrenergic receptors, dobutamine had markedly greater affinity for the α1-subtype identified by [3H]prazosin (KD = 0.09 μM in rat heart and 0.14 μM in rabbit uterus) than for the α2-subtype identified by [3H]dihydroergocryptine (DHE) (KD = 9.3 μM in human platelet) or by [3H]yohimbine (KD = 5.7 μM in rabbit uterus) (P < 0.001).

Like other β1-agonists, in the absence of guanine nucleotide, dobutamine competition curves for DHA binding in rat heart demonstrated two classes of binding sites, with one site of significantly higher affinity (KD = 0.5 μM, P = 0.008) than the single class of binding sites (KD = 5.2 μM) identified in the presence of guanine nucleotide. However, unlike β2- or α2-agonists, dobutamine displacement of DHA binding in rat lung or of DHE binding in human platelets demonstrated only a single class of binding sites, and guanine nucleotide had only minimal effects.

We conclude that dobutamine is selective for β1 as opposed to β2, and for α1 as opposed to α2 adrenergic receptors. Furthermore, guanine nucleotide effects on dobutamine binding, and biochemical response data in vitro suggest that dobutamine is a β1-agonist, but has little intrinsic activity at β2 and α2-receptors. This selectivity for adrenergic receptor subtypes may be part of the basis for dobutamine's distinctive pharmacologic properties in vivo.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 1703
page 1703
icon of scanned page 1704
page 1704
icon of scanned page 1705
page 1705
icon of scanned page 1706
page 1706
icon of scanned page 1707
page 1707
icon of scanned page 1708
page 1708
icon of scanned page 1709
page 1709
icon of scanned page 1710
page 1710
icon of scanned page 1711
page 1711
Version history
  • Version 1 (June 1, 1981): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts