Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Free access | 10.1172/JCI109497

Characterization of the Platelet Prostaglandin D2 Receptor: LOSS OF PROSTAGLANDIN D2 RECEPTORS IN PLATELETS OF PATIENTS WITH MYELOPROLIFERATIVE DISORDERS

Barry Cooper and David Ahern

West Roxbury Veterans Administration Medical Center, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Hematology Division and Department of Medicine, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

New England Nuclear Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts 02118

Find articles by Cooper, B. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

West Roxbury Veterans Administration Medical Center, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Hematology Division and Department of Medicine, Peter Bent Brigham Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115

New England Nuclear Corporation, Boston, Massachusetts 02118

Find articles by Ahern, D. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published August 1, 1979 - More info

Published in Volume 64, Issue 2 on August 1, 1979
J Clin Invest. 1979;64(2):586–590. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109497.
© 1979 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published August 1, 1979 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Prostaglandin (PG) D2 is synthesized in platelets at concentrations which could inhibit aggregation via activation of adenylate cyclase. To more directly define platelet-PG interactions, a binding assay has been developed for platelet PG receptors with [3H]PGD2 as ligand. [3H]PGD2 binding to intact platelets was saturable and rapid with the ligand bound by 3 min at 20°C. PG competed with the [3H]PGD2 binding site with a potency series: PGD2 (IC50 = 0.08 μM) ≫ PGI2 (IC50 = 2 μM) > PGE1 (IC50 = 6 μM) > PGF2α (IC50 = 8 μM). Scatchard analysis of binding data from six normal subjects showed a single class of binding sites with a dissociation constant (Kd) of 53 nM and 210 binding sites per platelet. This PGD2 receptor assay was then used to study platelets from five patients with myeloproliferative disorders (polycythemia vera, essential thrombocythemia, and chronic myelogenous leukemia), as over 90% of these patients have platelets resistant to the effects of PGD2 on aggregation and adenylate cyclase activity (1978. Blood.52: 618-626.). In the presence of 50 nM [3H]PGD2, the patients' platelets bound 7.1±2.9 fmol ligand/108 platelets compared with 15.1±1 fmol/108 platelets in normals, a decrease of 53% (P < 0.01). Scatchard analysis showed that the Kd of [3H]PGD2 binding (33 nM) was comparable to normal platelets, which indicates that the decreased PGD2 binding in these platelets represented fewer receptors rather than altered affinity of the ligand for the binding site. The 53% decrease in [3H]PGD2 binding correlated with a 48% decrease in PGD2-activated platelet adenylate cyclase. The characterization of the platelet PGD2 binding site provides further direct evidence that there are at least two PG receptors on platelets, one for PGE1 and PGI2, and a separate receptor for PGD2. Direct binding analysis will be a useful tool for studying the role of PG in regulating platelet function, as demonstrated by the selective loss of PGD2 binding sites in patients with myeloproliferative disorders.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 586
page 586
icon of scanned page 587
page 587
icon of scanned page 588
page 588
icon of scanned page 589
page 589
icon of scanned page 590
page 590
Version history
  • Version 1 (August 1, 1979): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts