Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Pancreatic Cancer (Jul 2025)
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Free access | 10.1172/JCI109293

Motility and Adhesiveness in Human Neutrophils: EFFECTS OF CHEMOTACTIC FACTORS

C. Wayne Smith, James C. Hollers, Richard A. Patrick, and Clare Hassett

Department of Anatomy and Microbiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Department of Public Health, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Find articles by Smith, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Anatomy and Microbiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Department of Public Health, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Find articles by Hollers, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Anatomy and Microbiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Department of Public Health, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Find articles by Patrick, R. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Anatomy and Microbiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Department of Public Health, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824

Find articles by Hassett, C. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published February 1, 1979 - More info

Published in Volume 63, Issue 2 on February 1, 1979
J Clin Invest. 1979;63(2):221–229. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI109293.
© 1979 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published February 1, 1979 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

Human peripheral blood neutrophils (PMN) obtained from healthy adults were examined in vitro with techniques adapted to assess the effects of chemotactic factors (CF) on cellular configuration and adhesiveness. The results were compared with those that use certain conventional techniques for assessing chemotaxis and chemokinesis. Exposure of PMN to N-formyl-l-methionyl-l-phenylalanine (f-Met-Phe), zymosan-activated serum, bacterial chemotactic factor, or a low molecular weight chemotactic factor from activated serum (C5a) in the absence of a gradient resulted in a change in cellular shape from a spherical to a polarized configuration in a high percentage of cells. This occurred rapidly in suspension, under conditions designed to exclude a role for cell adhesiveness, and was reversible upon removal of the CF. Restimulation of cells with the CF resulted in reappearance of the polarized configuration to the same extent as on initial stimulation with one exception: f-Met-Phe pretreated cells failed to respond to f-Met-Phe, though they responded fully to the other CF. Each CF caused a significant increase in PMN attachment to protein-coated glass. This enhanced adhesiveness was not reversible upon removal of the CF when the cells were treated under conditions shown to produce chemotactic deactivation. Cells treated under these conditions also exhibited significantly reduced motility on glass and in micropore filters in the absence of a gradient of CF. Bacterial chemotactic factor, even at high concentrations, failed to produce deactivation and did not cause a sustained enhancement of adhesiveness.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 221
page 221
icon of scanned page 222
page 222
icon of scanned page 223
page 223
icon of scanned page 224
page 224
icon of scanned page 225
page 225
icon of scanned page 226
page 226
icon of scanned page 227
page 227
icon of scanned page 228
page 228
icon of scanned page 229
page 229
Version history
  • Version 1 (February 1, 1979): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts