Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Free access | 10.1172/JCI106921

Cellular constraints to diffusion: The effect of antidiuretic hormone on water flows in isolated mammalian collecting tubules

James A. Schafer and Thomas E. Andreoli

Department of Medicine (Division of Nephrology), University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233

Department of Physiology, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233

Find articles by Schafer, J. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Department of Medicine (Division of Nephrology), University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233

Department of Physiology, University of Alabama Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama 35233

Find articles by Andreoli, T. in: PubMed | Google Scholar

Published May 1, 1972 - More info

Published in Volume 51, Issue 5 on May 1, 1972
J Clin Invest. 1972;51(5):1264–1278. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106921.
© 1972 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published May 1, 1972 - Version history
View PDF
Abstract

These experiments were intended to evaluate the effects of antidiuretic hormone (ADH) on dissipative water transport in cortical collecting tubules isolated from rabbit kidney. In the absence of ADH, the osmotic (Pf, cm sec-1) and diffusional (PDW cm sec-1) water permeability coefficients were, respectively, 6±6 and 4.7±1.3 (SD). When ADH was added to the bathing solutions, Pf and PDW rose to, respectively, 186±38 and 14.2±1.6 (SD). In the absence of ADH, the tubular cells were flat and the lateral intercellular spaces were closed when the perfusing and bathing solutions were, respectively, hypotonic and isotonic; in the presence of ADH, the cells swelled and the intercellular spaces dilated. These data suggest that ADH increased the water permeability of the luminal membranes of the tubules.

It was possible that the ADH-dependent Pf/PDW ratio was referable to the resistance of the epithelial cell layer (exclusive of luminal membranes) to water diffusion (RDW, sec cm-1). Such a possibility required that RDW be ∼ 650, i.e., approximately 25-fold greater than in an equivalent thickness of water. To test this view, it was assumed that RDi values for lipophilic solutes in lipid bilayer membranes and in luminal membranes were comparable. In lipid bilayer membranes, RDi was substantially less than 90 sec cm-1 for pyridine, n-butanol, and 5-hydroxyindole. In renal tubules, RDi for these solutes ranged from 795 to 2480 with and without ADH. It was assumed that, in the tubules, RDi was referable to cellular constraints to diffusion; for these solutes, the latter were 12-25 times greater than in water. Accordingly, it is possible that the ADH-dependent Pf/PDW ratio was also due to cellular constraints to diffusion.

Images.

Browse pages

Click on an image below to see the page. View PDF of the complete article

icon of scanned page 1264
page 1264
icon of scanned page 1265
page 1265
icon of scanned page 1266
page 1266
icon of scanned page 1267
page 1267
icon of scanned page 1268
page 1268
icon of scanned page 1269
page 1269
icon of scanned page 1270
page 1270
icon of scanned page 1271
page 1271
icon of scanned page 1272
page 1272
icon of scanned page 1273
page 1273
icon of scanned page 1274
page 1274
icon of scanned page 1275
page 1275
icon of scanned page 1276
page 1276
icon of scanned page 1277
page 1277
icon of scanned page 1278
page 1278
Version history
  • Version 1 (May 1, 1972): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts