A technique was developed to quantitate the absorption of ingested carbohydrate by means of continuous measurements of pulmonary H2 excretion. This technique is based on the observation that H2 is produced in the colon when carbohydrate is fermented by colonic bacteria, and this H2 is then excreted by the lungs. The quantitative relationship of pulmonary H2 excretion to unabsorbed carbohydrate was studied in nine subjects. After ingestion of 6.5, 13, and 26 g of lactulose (a nonabsorbable disaccharide), H2 excretion increased linearly, averaging (±1 SEM) 13±3.5, 23±7.2, and 49±7 ml per 2 hr. Because of consistent individual differences in H2 excretion per gram of lactulose, the variability of this linear response was less in a given subject, with the H2 excretion after 6.5 g and 26 g lactulose dosages averaging 55±4.2% and 214±16% of that observed after the 13 g dose. It was further demonstrated with fecal homogenates, as well as in rats after direct intracecal instillation of carbohydrate, that there was no significant difference in the rate of H2 formation from lactulose as compared with the normally ingested sugars. Thus, a subject's H2 excretion after a 13 g dose of lactulose can be used as a standard to convert H2 excretion after ingestion of other carbohydrates into grams of carbohydrate not absorbed. Application of this technique to seven partially gastrectomized patients indicated all subjects malabsorbed a portion of a 100 g dose of glucose whereas six of seven completely absorbed a 25 g dose. Malabsorption of physiologic quantities of various carbohydrates was clearly demonstrated in one subject. This technique appears to provide quantitative information on carbohydrate malabsorption not readily obtained by presently available techniques.
John H. Bond Jr., Michael D. Levitt
Usage data is cumulative from July 2024 through July 2025.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 338 | 7 |
54 | 19 | |
Scanned page | 314 | 2 |
Citation downloads | 80 | 0 |
Totals | 786 | 28 |
Total Views | 814 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.