Usage Information
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1971;50(11):2283-2294. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106726.
Abstract
A study was performed in five normal men in whom left ventricular volume was measured by thermodilution in the supine and 60° head-up postures, in the control state, and then during steady-state response to isoproterenol. The mean rate of circumferential shortening of the left ventricle was calculated for each of the postures in both inotropic states and was found to remain constant in the control state at 12.5 ±0.6 cm/sec in the supine posture and 13.3 ±0.5 cm/sec in the tilted posture. Similarly, mean rate of circumferential shortening remained constant in response to the positive inotropic effect of isoproterenol at 20.9 ±0.5 cm/sec in the supine position and 20.7 ±0.5 cm/sec in the tilted posture. It is concluded that the constancy of mean rate of circumferential shortening over the relatively broad physiologic range of left ventricular end-diastolic volume and mean force of ejection during a given state of myocardial contractility represents the coupled reciprocal influences of ventricular wall tension and myocardial fiber length on the velocity of ventricular wall shortening. Unlike stroke work, stroke power, and mean rate of left ventricular ejection, which are volume-dependent parameters of myocardial performance, the mean rate of circumferential shortening appears to be a reasonable index of left ventricular contractility, which in steady-state conditions is independent of left ventricular end-diastolic volume and mean ventricular wall force of ejection. In this study, changes in mean rate of circumferential shortening associated with changes of heart rate were small and variable.
Authors
H. W. Paley, Ian G. McDonald, Joseph Blumenthal, James Mailhot, Gunnard W. Modin
Usage data is cumulative from August 2024 through August 2025.
| Usage | JCI | PMC |
|---|---|---|
| Text version | 142 | 9 |
| 52 | 10 | |
| Scanned page | 358 | 5 |
| Citation downloads | 56 | 0 |
| Totals | 608 | 24 |
| Total Views | 632 | |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.
Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)