Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact

Usage Information

Experimental myocardial infarction: VI. Efficacy and toxicity of digitalis in acute and healing phase in intact conscious dogs
Raj Kumar, … , John C. Norman, Walter H. Abelmann
Raj Kumar, … , John C. Norman, Walter H. Abelmann
Published February 1, 1970
Citation Information: J Clin Invest. 1970;49(2):358-364. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI106244.
View: Text | PDF

Experimental myocardial infarction: VI. Efficacy and toxicity of digitalis in acute and healing phase in intact conscious dogs

  • Text
  • PDF
Abstract

Use of digitalis in myocardial infarction is controversial. To determine the efficacy and toxic threshold, serial infusions of 3 μg/kg per min of acetyl-strophanthidin were given to six intact conscious dogs 24 hr before and 1 hr, 2 days, and 7 days after myocardial infarction induced by inflation of a balloon cuff implanted on the left anterior descending coronary artery. Within 1 hr after myocardial infarction, heart rate increased by 28%. Left ventricular end-diastolic pressure increased from 7 to 20 mm Hg, and stroke volume decreased by 25%. At this time acetylstrophanthidin caused no beneficial hemodynamic change, 1 wk later, the heart rate and left ventricular end-diastolic pressure had declined toward normal but remained elevated. At this time, acetylstrophanthidin lowered left ventricular end-diastolic pressure by 25%, and increased the stroke volume and cardiac output by 25% and 21% respectively, without any change in heart rate or aortic pressure. Tolerance to acetylstrophanthidin, defined as appearance of ventricular tachycardia, declined the 1st hr after myocardial infarction by 24% (P<0.05) from the control level of 43 ±4 μg/kg (SEM), but subsequently returned to control.

Authors

Raj Kumar, William B. Hood Jr., Julio Joison, David P. Gilmour, John C. Norman, Walter H. Abelmann

×

Usage data is cumulative from May 2024 through May 2025.

Usage JCI PMC
Text version 111 1
PDF 41 8
Scanned page 265 1
Citation downloads 52 0
Totals 469 10
Total Views 479
(Click and drag on plot area to zoom in. Click legend items above to toggle)

Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.

Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.

Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts