Go to JCI Insight
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • By specialty
    • COVID-19
    • Cardiology
    • Gastroenterology
    • Immunology
    • Metabolism
    • Nephrology
    • Neuroscience
    • Oncology
    • Pulmonology
    • Vascular biology
    • All ...
  • Videos
    • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
    • Video Abstracts
  • Reviews
    • View all reviews ...
    • Complement Biology and Therapeutics (May 2025)
    • Evolving insights into MASLD and MASH pathogenesis and treatment (Apr 2025)
    • Microbiome in Health and Disease (Feb 2025)
    • Substance Use Disorders (Oct 2024)
    • Clonal Hematopoiesis (Oct 2024)
    • Sex Differences in Medicine (Sep 2024)
    • Vascular Malformations (Apr 2024)
    • View all review series ...
  • Viewpoint
  • Collections
    • In-Press Preview
    • Clinical Research and Public Health
    • Research Letters
    • Letters to the Editor
    • Editorials
    • Commentaries
    • Editor's notes
    • Reviews
    • Viewpoints
    • 100th anniversary
    • Top read articles

  • Current issue
  • Past issues
  • Specialties
  • Reviews
  • Review series
  • Conversations with Giants in Medicine
  • Video Abstracts
  • In-Press Preview
  • Clinical Research and Public Health
  • Research Letters
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Editorials
  • Commentaries
  • Editor's notes
  • Reviews
  • Viewpoints
  • 100th anniversary
  • Top read articles
  • About
  • Editors
  • Consulting Editors
  • For authors
  • Publication ethics
  • Publication alerts by email
  • Advertising
  • Job board
  • Contact
Top
  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal
  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Advertisement

Research ArticleAging Free access | 10.1172/JCI64162

11β-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase blockade prevents age-induced skin structure and function defects

Ana Tiganescu,1 Abd A. Tahrani,1 Stuart A. Morgan,1 Marcela Otranto,2,3 Alexis Desmoulière,2 Lianne Abrahams,1 Zaki Hassan-Smith,1 Elizabeth A. Walker,1 Elizabeth H. Rabbitt,1 Mark S. Cooper,1 Kurt Amrein,4 Gareth G. Lavery,1 and Paul M. Stewart1

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Tiganescu, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Tahrani, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Morgan, S. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Otranto, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Desmoulière, A. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Abrahams, L. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Hassan-Smith, Z. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Walker, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Rabbitt, E. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Cooper, M. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Amrein, K. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Lavery, G. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

1Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, School of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, United Kingdom. 2Department of Physiology and EA 6309, Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Limoges, Limoges, France. 3Histology and Embryology Department, State University of Rio de Janeiro (UERJ), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. 4F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Basel, Switzerland.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Find articles by Stewart, P. in: JCI | PubMed | Google Scholar

Authorship note: Gareth G. Lavery and Paul M. Stewart are co–senior authors.

Published June 3, 2013 - More info

Published in Volume 123, Issue 7 on July 1, 2013
J Clin Invest. 2013;123(7):3051–3060. https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI64162.
© 2013 The American Society for Clinical Investigation
Published June 3, 2013 - Version history
Received: November 19, 2012; Accepted: March 28, 2013
View PDF
Abstract

Glucocorticoid (GC) excess adversely affects skin integrity, inducing thinning and impaired wound healing. Aged skin, particularly that which has been photo-exposed, shares a similar phenotype. Previously, we demonstrated age-induced expression of the GC-activating enzyme 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) in cultured human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs). Here, we determined 11β-HSD1 levels in human skin biopsies from young and older volunteers and examined the aged 11β-HSD1 KO mouse skin phenotype. 11β-HSD1 activity was elevated in aged human and mouse skin and in PE compared with donor-matched photo-protected human biopsies. Age-induced dermal atrophy with deranged collagen structural organization was prevented in 11β-HSD1 KO mice, which also exhibited increased collagen density. We found that treatment of HDFs with physiological concentrations of cortisol inhibited rate-limiting steps in collagen biosynthesis and processing. Furthermore, topical 11β-HSD1 inhibitor treatment accelerated healing of full-thickness mouse dorsal wounds, with improved healing also observed in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice. These findings suggest that elevated 11β-HSD1 activity in aging skin leads to increased local GC generation, which may account for adverse changes occurring in the elderly, and 11β-HSD1 inhibitors may be useful in the treatment of age-associated impairments in dermal integrity and wound healing.

Introduction

Glucocorticoid (GC) excess, whether of endogenous (e.g., Cushing’s syndrome) or exogenous (topical or systemic therapy) origin, is associated with a diverse range of adverse side effects including adipose tissue redistribution, proteolysis, bone resorption, and hyperglycemia manifesting respectively as omental adiposity, muscle weakness, osteoporosis, and insulin resistance (1).

In skin, GC excess leads to marked atrophy with dermal and epidermal thinning according to both human (2–4) and rodent (5, 6) studies. GCs also induce a flattening of the normally undulating “rete ridges” at the dermal-epidermal junction (DEJ) (7). At a cellular level, dermal collagen content in human skin is decreased following topical and systemic GC treatment (3, 8, 9) and is similarly decreased in rats following subcutaneous dexamethasone injection (10). Subsequently, there is a profound increase in the transparency of skin with a tissue paper–like consistency, increased fragility, tearing and bruising (7), increased transepidermal water loss (TEWL) (11), poor wound healing (12, 13), and increased infection risk (14).

Many of these features are also shared with the phenotype of aging skin, including thinning and DEJ flattening (15), decreased dermal cellularity (16), reduced collagen content (17–20), and reduced dermal fibroblast proliferation and collagen secretion in cells from older donors (18). Consequently, aged skin also suffers from an impaired permeability barrier, with increased TEWL (21), altered mechanical properties (22), delayed wound healing (23, 24), and increased disease prevalence (25).

We hypothesize that with no appreciable changes in circulating cortisol concentrations with age, changes in tissue-specific prereceptor regulation of local GC availability by 11 β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) may explain the phenotypic link between GC excess and aging skin. In intact cells, 11β-HSD1 functions exclusively as an NADPH-dependent oxoreductase, activating cortisol from cortisone. We recently characterized the expression of 11β-HSD1 in human and rodent skin, reporting increased 11β-HSD1 expression in primary human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) from older donors (26). Increased expression was also detected in donor-matched photo-exposed (PE) versus photo-protected (PP) HDFs (26), suggesting that an increased capacity for local GC activation may represent a novel mediator of age-related changes in skin physiology and function common to both intrinsic and extrinsic aging.

Here, we investigated age-dependent changes in 11β-HSD1 human and murine skin tissue explants. Additionally, we examined alterations in dermal integrity, cellularity, and collagen content in murine skin from age-matched 11β-HSD1–null and WT littermates and report a striking reversal of age-induced dermal morphology in KO mice. We describe the GC-driven changes in collagen biosynthesis, modification, and processing gene expression that may underpin these in vivo observations. Finally, we demonstrate the translational therapeutic potential of 11β-HSD1 blockade by reporting accelerated wound healing in young mice treated with a selective 11β-HSD1 inhibitor and in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice relative to their WT littermates.

Results

11β-HSD1 expression increases in aging skin. 11β-HSD1 activity in human skin obtained from older versus younger donors increased by 42% and 26% in PP and PE biopsies, respectively (Figure 1A). Interestingly, activity in donor-matched PE versus PP samples was also elevated by 36% and 21% in young and aged donors, respectively (Figure 1A). These results using intact tissue are in agreement with our previous observations in cultured HDFs (26). Moreover, 11β-HSD1 activity was 69% higher in aged mouse skin tissue explants (Figure 1B), supporting our human tissue findings and suggesting that increased 11β-HSD1 levels in aged skin are a common feature of mammalian aging.

11β-HSD1 activity increases in aging skin ex vivo.Figure 1

11β-HSD1 activity increases in aging skin ex vivo. (A) 11β-HSD1 activity (percentage of conversion of 100 nM cortisone to cortisol) was greater in aged (>60 years) versus young (20–30 years) human skin in both PP (n = 20) and PE (n = 20) biopsies. Activity was also greater in donor-matched PE versus PP samples from young (n = 20) and aged (n = 20) donors. (B) 11β-HSD1 activity (pmol/mg/h) was also greater in older (91–99 weeks; n = 5) versus younger (11–20 weeks; n = 10) mouse skin. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Furthermore, immunohistochemical studies identified increased 11β-HSD1 protein expression in dermal fibroblasts from PE relative to donor-matched PP skin sections, with increased expression also observed in the epidermal compartment (Figure 2, A and B). Analysis of 11β-HSD1 staining in PE sections confirmed a 2.5-fold and 3.5-fold increase in dermal and epidermal expression, respectively (Figure 2C), and a 4-fold increase in endogenous epidermal melanin staining (internal control). We also examined the expression of hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase, the enzyme supplying NADPH cofactor for 11β-HSD1, and the GC receptor, but found them to be unaffected by donor age and site in human skin or by age and 11β-HSD1 KO in mice (data not shown).

11β-HSD1 expression increases in PE skin.Figure 2

11β-HSD1 expression increases in PE skin. 11β-HSD1 staining was increased in epidermal keratinocytes (asterisk) and dermal fibroblasts (arrows) in PE sections (B) relative to donor-matched PP (A) sections (n = 14). Original magnification, ×20. (C) Quantification of tissue staining confirmed elevated dermal and epidermal 11β-HSD1 protein expression (fold change in PE relative to PP sections; n = 14). Endogenous epidermal melanin was used as a positive control and showed the expected increased staining in PE versus PP samples (n = 18). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01.

Reversal of dermal atrophy in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice. Aged WT mouse skin displayed a loose collagen network with noticeable atrophy and a sponge-like appearance characterized by large, vacant interfibril spaces (Figure 3A). In some areas of tissue sections from aged mice, the collagen meshwork appeared shredded, with little or no structural integrity or organization. 11β-HSD1 activity in KO mouse skin was reduced to background levels, with negligible mRNA expression (Figure 3B). Strikingly, aged KO mice displayed a histological skin profile more comparable to that of the young WT littermates compared with the aged WT littermates, with improved dermal integrity and more orderly collagen organization (Figure 3C).

Reversal of dermal atrophy in aged 11β-HSD1–null mice.Figure 3

Reversal of dermal atrophy in aged 11β-HSD1–null mice. (A) Comparison of young and aged WT skin sections (n = 4) revealed a grossly altered dermal organization of collagen in the latter, with a loss of structure and tissue integrity (arrows). (B) 11β-HSD1 activity (n = 15) and mRNA (n = 6) were negligible in 11β-HSD1–null mouse skin compared with WT littermates (n = 3). (C) Aged KO mice displayed a striking improvement in dermal structural organization compared with their WT littermates, reverting to a phenotype more comparable to young mice. AT = adipose tissue. Scale bars: 50 μM. ***P < 0.001.

Collagen density as assessed with Masson trichrome staining was also improved in 11β-HSD1 KO (Figure 4B) compared with WT mice (Figure 4A). Quantification of collagen staining intensity revealed a 2-fold increase in the aged KO mice (Figure 4C).

Improved collagen density in aged 11β-HSD1–null mice.Figure 4

Improved collagen density in aged 11β-HSD1–null mice. Collagen staining intensity appeared greater in aged KO (B) versus WT (A) mouse skin sections, contributing to the improved structural appearance in these mice. (C) Quantification of staining confirmed an increased collagen density in aged KO versus WT mice (n = 4), with a similar trend in young mice (n = 4). Scale bars: 50 μM. *P < 0.05.

GC regulation of collagen biosynthesis and processing gene expression. Our in vivo studies identified dermal collagen integrity and structural organization as important GC targets in aging skin. The regulation of collagen homeostasis (e.g., posttranslational modification, transport, and extracellular maturation) by physiological concentrations of endogenous GC had not been previously investigated. Cortisol treatment (100 nM) in HDFs (n = 5) downregulated mRNA expression of genes at various stages in the synthesis and processing of mature collagen (Table 1). These included prolyl (LEPREL1, LEPREL2, and P4HA2, with an 80%, 33%, and 36% decrease, respectively) and lysyl (PLOD2; 53% decrease) hydroxylases, which hydroxylate the proline and lysine residues on nascent collagen propeptides that facilitate helical trimeric procollagen assembly. We also noted a trend toward reduced expression of LEPRE1, P4HB, and PLOD1 hydroxylase mRNA.

Table 1

GC-regulated target genes in cultured fibroblasts impair collagen biosynthesis and processing

The transport and secretion of newly formed procollagen helices are assisted by the collagen-specific chaperone HSP47 (SERPINH1), which also exhibited reduced expression following GC treatment. Following secretion into the extracellular environment, the nonhelical procollagen “ends” are cleaved by membrane-bound collagen peptidases (ADAMTS2 and BMP1), which did not appear to be GC regulated. The resulting tropocollagen peptides are cross-linked by lysyl oxidases (LOX and LOXL1-4), which use lysine and hydroxylysine residues to form covalent bonds in the resultant collagen fibril. Interestingly, mRNA expression for all 5 lysyl oxidases was reduced by GC treatment, with decreases ranging from 31% to 53%. The stability of collagen fibrils is further supported by proteoglycans such as decorin (DCN), which displayed a 2.7-fold induction of mRNA expression following GC treatment. Collagen-degrading MMPs and their inhibitors were also GC regulated, with reduced expression of MMP1 (71%), MMP12 (44%), and TIMP3 (64%) and a 4.6-fold induction of TIMP4. We found that MMP8 and MMP10 also displayed a trend toward GC-mediated induction and reduction, respectively.

Age-induced changes in collagen biosynthesis gene expression are rescued in 11β-HSD1 KO mice. In mouse skin, collagen (Col1a1) expression was unaffected by age or 11β-HSD1 genotype (Figure 5D), but we found a 64% age-induced decrease in mouse skin prolyl hydroxylase (Leprel1) expression, which was fully restored in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice to levels comparable to those of young animals (Figure 5A). Similarly, a greater than 90% decrease in lysyl hydroxylase (Plod1) expression in aged WT skin was also partially rescued in the KO littermates (Figure 5B).

Improved collagen synthesis gene expression in aged 11β-HSD1–null mice.Figure 5

Improved collagen synthesis gene expression in aged 11β-HSD1–null mice. (A) Expression of the prolyl hydroxylase LEPREL1 decreased in the aged WT mice (n = 3) relative to the younger animals (n = 5). This was reversed in the aged KO mice (n = 4). (B) Similarly, the age-induced decrease in lysyl hydroxylase PLOD1 expression was partially rescued in aged KO mice. (C) TIMP4 expression was also reduced in aged WT, but not KO, mice relative to young WT mice. (D) COL1A1 expression was unaltered with age or genotype. (E and F) An age-induced decrease in MMP2 and MMP3 was also observed but was unaffected by genotype. *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. NS, nonsignificant.

Timp4 expression was also decreased by approximately 80% in the aged WT mice, but not in the KO mice (Figure 5C). By contrast, the age-induced downregulation of Mmp2 and Mmp3 expression was unaltered in the KO animals (Figure 5, E and F).

Local blockade of endogenous GC activation accelerates wound healing in vivo. Body weight at each time point was indistinguishable between the vehicle- and inhibitor-treated groups (data not shown). Gross wound morphology revealed accelerated closure in 11β-HSD1 inhibitor–treated mice (Figure 6A). Indeed, accelerated re-epithelialization (ranging from 35% to greater than 100%) was observed in inhibitor-treated animals at each time point measured. For example, the area of neoepidermis at 14 days after wounding was 23% in the vehicle-treated mice, but increased to 50% following 11β-HSD1 blockade (P < 0.001; n = 12) (Figure 6B). Moreover, while vehicle-treated mice required 18 days to reach 40% re-epithelialization, 11β-HSD1 blockade reduced this time by over a week, attaining a similar level of recovery by day 9.

Accelerated wound healing in 11β-HSD1 inhibitor–treated mice.Figure 6

Accelerated wound healing in 11β-HSD1 inhibitor–treated mice. (A) Representative images showing improved wound closure in mice treated every 2–3 days with 1% RO151. (B) Accelerated re-epithelialization was recorded at each time point measured (n = 5–12). *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001.

Importantly, we also observed faster wound closure in the aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice compared with their WT littermates (Figure 7A). 11β-HSD1 KO wound areas were reduced by approximately 50% at 4 days (P < 0.05, n = 6), while WT wound areas were still comparable to those on day 0, with a similar trend observed on day 2 (Figure 7B).

Accelerated healing in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice.Figure 7

Accelerated healing in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice. (A) Representative images showing accelerated wound closure in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice. (B) Increased healing was observed at 4 days, with a similar trend at 2 days (n = 6). *P < 0.05.

Discussion

Our previous studies reported an increase in 11β-HSD1 expression in HDFs obtained from older compared with younger donors and in PE cells relative to donor-matched PP cells in culture (26). Here, we provide new evidence that these in vitro observations translate into increased 11β-HSD1 expression and activity in aging skin both in humans and mice. Our data support a role for 11β-HSD1 in both intrinsic (e.g., PP skin) and “accelerated” extrinsic aging (e.g., PE skin); with increased 11β-HSD1 expression and activity in PE skin further exacerbating the age-induced increase in PP skin.

The increased 11β-HSD oxoreductase activity measured in our human cohort reflects the “net” effect of both 11β-HSD isozymes resulting from increased 11β-HSD1 or, alternatively, from decreased 11β-HSD2. Our findings demonstrating increased 11β-HSD1 protein in PE human skin and increased oxoreductase activity in aging mouse skin (devoid of 11β-HSD2 activity and expression) confirm that altered levels of the type 1 isozyme are exclusively responsible. Immunohistochemical studies in human skin demonstrated 11β-HSD1 staining predominantly in PP epidermis, with increased staining in photo-aged keratinocytes in addition to induced expression in PE dermal fibroblasts. Although our subsequent studies focused primarily on the dermal consequences of age-induced increased 11β-HSD1 activity, our observation suggests that both cell types contribute to this increase. Further studies should elucidate whether impaired epidermal function in aged skin is also a consequence of increased GC activation.

To the best of our knowledge, our group was the first to report an association between 11β-HSD1 and aging using primary human osteoblasts (27). Subsequently, a growing body of evidence has suggested that the age-related increase in 11β-HSD1 occurs in a variety of cells and tissues, including lymphocytes (28), bone (29), brain (30), and adipose (31), implicating a role for 11β-HSD1 in systemic aging. In these tissues, increased local GC activation is postulated to contribute to the increased risk of fracture and osteoporosis and impaired cognitive function associated with aging. Improved cognition and increased long-term potentiation have been reported in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice relative to age-matched controls (32), with improved memory consolidation, recall, and social recognition also reported following treatment with specific 11β-HSD1 inhibitors (33, 34).

Our results also demonstrate that increased 11β-HSD1 activity is in part responsible for the phenotypic consequences of aging skin, with aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice displaying a reversal in age-induced dermal atrophy and structural disorganization with increased collagen density. If translated to humans, these effects may lead to improvements in skin function in the elderly. Studies have shown a close relationship between the ECM microenvironment (including mechanical properties of young relative to aged collagen) and synthesis of molecules that regulate cell-ECM attachment, repair, and turnover by resident dermal fibroblasts (18, 24, 35, 36). Moreover, degraded ECM is central to facilitating tumor metastasis (37, 38), suggesting that preventing or limiting local GC activation may also reduce skin cancer risk. Our studies of HDFs treated with physiological concentrations of endogenous cortisol were designed to further investigate the potential mechanisms contributing to the improvements in collagen organization in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice. We identified several previously unreported GC-regulated genes in HDFs underpinning the key stages of collagen biosynthesis and processing (Figure 8). These include the reduced expression of enzymes involved in procollagen hydroxylation (required for correct molecular assembly), intracellular transport, and extracellular cross-linking, which may explain the collagen atrophy observed in our studies and reported by others (39).

GC treatment impairs multiple elements of collagen biosynthesis and processFigure 8

GC treatment impairs multiple elements of collagen biosynthesis and processing. GC treatment of primary HDFs decreased collagen transcription (1) and altered collagen metabolizing enzymes (7) as previously shown. We found additional GC targets, including reduced expression of collagen posttranslational hydroxylation enzymes (3), collagen chaperone (4), and all lysyl oxidase enzyme isoforms required for collagen inter- and intrafibril cross-link formation (6).

Reduced expression of prolyl hydroxylases by GC in skin was previously limited to studies in rats (40, 41). Recently, Vranka et al. characterized the phenotype of the prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1–null (LEPRE1-null) mouse which, in addition to bone and tendon abnormalities, displayed a less densely packed dermis, with fewer collagen fibrils in the skin of newborn KO mice and skin thinning in adults, with collagen fibril clumping and interfibril spaces (42). These findings are endorsed by mutations in LEPRE1 in humans, which cause a recessive metabolic bone disorder resembling lethal/severe osteogenesis imperfecta (43), with patients also exhibiting overmodification of type I procollagen chains in dermal fibroblast cultures from affected individuals (44).

Mutations in genes encoding lysyl hydroxylases are known to cause Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VI, characterized by neonatal kyphoscoliosis, generalized joint laxity, skin fragility, and severe muscle hypotonia at birth (45), as well as Bruck syndrome (46), affecting bone collagen cross-linking (47), with overexpression associated with skin fibrosis (46). Our results show a decrease in the expression of all 5 known lysyl oxidase isozymes following GC treatment, in agreement with previous rodent studies evaluating the effect of local GC treatment (41). Decreased lysyl oxidase activity has been identified as a cause of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome variant type IX and the clinically distinct Menkes syndrome, both manifesting with skin laxity and hyperextensibility (48).

We also report GC-induced differential regulation of several enzymes involved in collagen turnover and remodeling, including downregulation of MMP1, the elastin-degrading MMP12 as previously reported (49, 50), and a similar trend for MMP10. Conversely, TIMP4, a potent inhibitor of the type IV collagenase MMP2 (51), was upregulated, whereas an opposing effect was observed for TIMP3. Although still poorly understood, altered expression of these highly complex mediators of collagen remodeling through increases in local GC availability are likely to play an important role in aging skin phenotype manifestation. Collectively, the identification of these critical regulators of collagen biosynthesis as novel GC targets in HDF raises the possibility that altered local GC availability could contribute to several aspects of altered collagen structural organization in aging skin.

Subsequently, we analyzed the expression of GC-regulated genes in our KO mouse model and showed a reversal of age-related decreases in Leprel1, Plod1 and Timp4 expression. Procollagen type 1 expression (Col1a1) was largely unaffected by age or genotype, suggesting that altered posttranslational processing and remodeling, rather than decreased collagen synthesis, may be responsible for the age-induced changes in dermal structure, as previously proposed by others (52). Furthermore, the decreased expression of Mmp2 and Mmp3 in older WT mice was maintained in the KO animals, suggesting that a specific subset of collagen biosynthesis and remodeling genes may be involved in the etiology of skin aging.

These findings suggest that blockade of the age-related increase in 11β-HSD1 activity may promote improved structural and functional properties in aging skin. Selective 11β-HSD1 inhibitors have already been deployed by many pharmaceutical companies, largely on the premise that they may reverse or prevent obesity-related diabetes mellitus (53–57). Our collaborative research using a highly selective and effective 11β-HSD1 inhibitor, RO151, demonstrates accelerated re-epithelialization and wound healing and presents the exciting possibility that topical 11β-HSD1 inhibitors might be used to combat age-related impairments in wound healing. Our observation that aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice exhibit accelerated wound healing relative to WT littermates further supports this possibility.

Although the central theme of the current research focused on chronological aging, our finding demonstrating elevated 11β-HSD1 activity and expression in PE skin presents 11β-HSD1 as a candidate indicator of photo-aging and extends the scope of pharmacological intervention and/or treatment to photo-damaged skin. Finally, our studies may have implications in the context of slow-healing wounds occurring in diabetics or sufferers of chronic stress, where limiting local GC generation could also improve healing.

Methods

Materials were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich unless otherwise stated.

Tissue preparation and cell culture

Human tissue. A group of 40 healthy Caucasians consisting of 20 young (year ± SD, 25.7 ± 3.0; 9 female and 11 male) and 20 older (72.2 ± 8.2; 11 female and 9 male) donors underwent 3-mm biopsies of PE (lower outer) and PP (inner upper) arm skin. The skin was sterilized and covered with Supadrape (Westfield Medical Ltd.) containing a central aperture prior to local anesthetic injection with 2 ml of 2% lidocaine HCl (National Veterinary Services). Following dispersion, skin was tested for numbness before obtaining 2 biopsies per site using a Stiefel 3-mm Biopsy Punch (Medisave). Cotton gauze was used to contain bleeding before Inadine patch and Mepore dressing application (Oncall Medical Supplies). Tissue was stored in complete media (RPMI-1640, 10% FCS, 2 mM L-glutamine, 1% Pen-Strep, 1% sodium pyruvate, and 1% nonessential amino acids) and either analyzed immediately or snap-frozen and stored at –80°C.

Mouse tissue. Studies were conducted as previously described (26). Mouse skin from male young (11–20 weeks of age, n = 10) and aged (91–99 weeks of age, n = 5) WT mice and from littermates with global deletion of 11β-HSD1 (generated in-house; n = 15) (58) was obtained by dissection of shaved skin from the lower dorsal region. 11β-HSD1 KO mice were backcrossed (greater than 9 generations) into C57BL6/J mice, with appropriate strain controls used.

HDF culture and treatment. HDFs were cultured from lower outer arm biopsies from Caucasian donors of variable age by incubation for 8 days at 37°C in a 5% CO2 atmosphere in T25 flasks containing 2 ml of complete media.

Upon attaining 80% confluence, cells were passaged at a ratio of 1:3 as required. For GC treatment, cells were seeded into 6-well plates at 70% confluence and incubated overnight. Cells were treated with 100 nM cortisol (in duplicate) for 48 hours and compared with vehicle-treated controls.

11β-HSD1 activity assays

One biopsy per site per human donor (~4–10 mg) was analyzed for 11β-HSD1 (oxoreductase) activity. Mouse skin explants (~6 mg) were analyzed in duplicate. Intact tissue activity was measured in 10-ml glass tubes containing 0.5 ml of complete media, 100 pmol of cortisone or 11-dehydrocorticosterone for human and mouse skin, respectively, and tracer amounts of [3H] cortisone or 11-dehydrocorticosterone as previously reported (26). For human tissue, activity was expressed as the percentage of conversion of cortisone to cortisol (24 hours). In these samples, activity was not normalized for tissue weight — which was increased in PE samples (Supplemental Figure 1A; supplemental material available online with this article; doi: 10.1172/JCI64162DS1), owing to a deeper dermal layer composed primarily of inert structural proteins, e.g., collagen — as this did not correlate with enzyme activity in either group (Supplemental Figure 1B). Furthermore, punch biopsies standardized the same surface area between samples. For mouse samples, enzyme activity was normalized for tissue weight (pmol corticosterone/mg tissue/h) as surface area varied.

Immunohistochemistry

11β-HSD1 protein detection in frozen human skin sections (fixed in 3:1 acetone/ethanol) was analyzed by immunohistochemistry using a primary mAb (Abcam) and an alkaline phosphatase–conjugated goat anti-mouse secondary Ab (Dako). Fast Red TR/Naphthol AS-MX Tablets were used to visualize the staining according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Briefly, slides were incubated for 15 minutes in 56:1 methanol/hydrogen peroxide to inactivate endogenous peroxidases, rinsed with deionized water, and blocked for 1 hour in TBSAT (10 ml 10× TBS [121.2 g Tris/160.4 g sodium chloride, pH 7.6, in 2 liters of deionized water], stored in aliquots at –20°C), 3 g of BSA, 50 μl of Triton X100, and 10% goat serum. Slides were drained and incubated for 2 hours in fresh TBSAT with the primary Ab diluted 1:100 before washing under agitation in three 10-minute washes of TBST (~800 ml 1× TBS plus 0.05% Tween-20). Slides were drained and incubated for 30 minutes in fresh TBSAT with the secondary Ab diluted 1:200 before repeating washes. Following visualization, slides were air-dried before applying aqueous mounting medium and coverslips. Staining was observed in similar structures to those previously described using a polyclonal Ab (26) and was negligible when substituting equimolar concentrations of isotype control (mouse IgM; AbCam) for the primary Ab (Supplemental Figure 2).

Sections were photographed using a Nuance multispectral imaging system (CRi, Advanced Molecular Vision). Nuance image analysis software was used to annotate the DEJ and stratum corneum-granulosum interface (CRi, Advanced Molecular Vision). Staining intensity was measured in the epidermis and upper dermis.

Histology

Tissue was stored in 10% neutral buffered formalin (4 g sodium monophosphate, 6.5 g sodium diphosphate in 900 ml of distilled water, and 100 ml of 37% formaldehyde) before paraffin embedding and sectioning. Paired sections from each age and genotype were cut per slide. Following dewaxing and rehydration (26), the slides were stained with H&E, mounted, coverslipped, and analyzed in a blinded fashion by 2 independent researchers. Sections were stained for collagen using a Masson trichrome kit according to the manufacturer’s guidelines. Collagen stain intensity was determined using the Nuance system described above.

RNA extraction and reverse transcription

Total RNA was extracted from primary cultures of HDFs using the Tri-Reagent method (Sigma-Aldrich), with generation of cDNA by reverse transcription as previously described (26). Tissue RNA was extracted using an RNeasy Fibrous Tissue kit (QIAGEN) using a PowerGen 125 homogenizer (Fisher Scientific) according to the manufacturer’s protocol.

Real-time PCR gene expression analysis

HDF studies. The BioMark system (Fluidigm) was used to analyze the expression of 33 genes involved in collagen biosynthesis and processing. Specific target preamplification was conducted in 5-μl volumes consisting of a 2.5-μl TaqMan PreAmp Master Mix (2×; Applied Biosystems), a 1.25-μl pooled TaqMan gene expression assay (1 μl for each assay and 4 μl 1× TE buffer, 0.2× final assay concentration), and 1.25 μl (25–50 ng) of cDNA (or 1× TE for the negative control). Following brief vortexing and centrifugation, samples were heated to 95°C for 10 minutes followed by 14 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds and 60κC for 4 minutes. Samples were then diluted 1:5 with 20 μl of 1× TE buffer. Following preamplification, 1 μl of each sample was also pooled and serially diluted in 1× TE buffer (1:10, 1:100, 1:1,000, and 1:10,000) for standard curve generation.

Samples (in triplicate) and standards (in duplicate) were prepared for loading onto the chip in 8-μl volumes in a 96-well plate: 4 μl of TaqMan Universal PCR Master Mix (2×); 0.4 μl of GE Sample Loading Reagent (20×, Fluidigm); and 3.6 μl of preamplified cDNA per standard. Plates were vortexed, centrifuged, and stored at 5°C until required. Gene expression assays were prepared in 8-μl volumes: 4 μl of TaqMan Gene Expression Assay (20×) and 4 μl of Assay Loading Reagent (2×; Fluidigm), giving final concentrations of 9 μM and 2.5 μM for the primers and probe per assay, respectively. Samples were vortexed, centrifuged and stored at 5°C. Chips were primed using the IFC controller according to the manufacturer’s protocol (Fluidigm), loaded with 5 μl of Sample Mix, 5 μl of Assay Mix, and activated using the IFC controller. Chips were processed on a BioMark quantitative PCR reader (Fluidigm). Following standard curve verification, ΔCt values were determined for each sample by normalizing to the geometric mean of 4 housekeeper genes (RPL13, TBP, B2M, and PPIA). Mouse tissue: Leprel1, Plod1, Timp4, Col1a1, Mmp2, and Mmp3 mRNA levels were measured (in duplicate) by conventional real-time PCR using an ABI 7500 system (PerkinElmer). PCR was performed in 10-μl reactions in 96-well plates. Reactions contained 5 μl of 2× TaqMan Universal PCR Mastermix, 0.5 μl of assay (900 nM primer and 250 nM probe final concentrations), 3.5 μl of distilled water, and 1 μl of cDNA (25–50 ng). Reactions were standardized to the housekeeper 18S (all Applied Biosystems). Reactions were as follows: 50°C for 2 minutes, 95°C for 10 minutes, 40 cycles of 95°C for 15 seconds, and 60°C for 1 minute.

Wound-healing studies

11β-HSD1 inhibitor studies. Inhibitor studies were conducted in 8-week-old male Swiss mice (n = 5–12) using RO151, known to selectively inhibit 11β-HSD1 activity in vivo (59), with an IC50 of 40 nM (± 4 nM SE; n = 17) against the murine homolog (determined by cellular assays using 3T3-L1 adipocytes; data not shown). One percent RO151 was formulated in 9.1% hydroxypropyl beta cyclodextrin, 0.5% Tris, and 0.45% sodium chloride (pH 7.3) before 3% hydroxypropyl methyl cellulose was added at room temperature under agitation to produce a clear gel.

Full-thickness dorsal wounds of approximately 10 mm2 were created under ketamine-xylazine anesthesia. The gel containing 11β-HSD1 inhibitor and vehicle was applied and covered with OpSite Flexifix (Smith & Nephew) and Hypafix tape (BSN Medical). Applications were repeated every 2–3 days until 21 days after wounding. Wound photographs and body weight measurements were taken at each time point. Wound healing is presented as the re-epithelialized area measured by subtracting the area uncovered by neoepidermis from the original wound area calculated using ImageJ software (NIH).

11β-HSD1 KO studies. Aged male 11β-HSD1 KO (52 weeks of age ± 0.68 SD) and WT (51 weeks of age ± 0.67 SD) mice (n = 6) were anesthetized and shaved before a 4-mm full-thickness skin punch biopsy was performed on the right side of the thorax using a biopsy punch (Acuderm). Wounds were photographed at 0, 2, 4, and 6 days after the biopsy was measured as above.

Statistics

Experimental data were analyzed using GraphPad Prism software (GraphPad). A Student’s t test was used to compare data displaying a normal distribution (paired tests were used as appropriate). Wound-healing studies in aged 11β-HSD1 KO mice were assessed using 2-way ANOVA (SigmaStat 3.1). Data represent the means ± SEM. The null hypothesis was rejected at a significance level of P < 0.05, with data values as follows: *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; and ***P < 0.001.

Study approval

Animal studies were conducted under Home Office license and following approval of the Joint Ethics and Research Governance Committee of the University of Birmingham (Birmingham, United Kingdom) in accordance with the UK Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act, 1986. Human studies were conducted following ethical approval (Black Country Research Ethics Committee, Manchester, United Kingdom) and according to the Declaration of Helsinki Principles. All participants gave their written informed consent before study enrolment.

Supplemental material

View Supplemental data

Acknowledgments

This work was supported through a BBSRC Case PhD studentship. Additional support was provided from a Wellcome Trust Programme Grant, an ERC Advanced Research Fellowship (to P.M. Stewart), and a BBSRC David Philips fellowship to Gareth Lavery (BB/G023468/1). M. Otranto holds a doctoral fellowship from Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. We are grateful to Nelly Bordeau (Department of Physiology, University of Limoges, France) for technical help with wound-healing studies.

Address correspondence to: Paul M. Stewart, College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham B15 2TT, United Kingdom. Phone: 44.0.121.415.8708; Fax: 44.0.121.415.8712 or 44.0.121.414.7149; E-mail: p.m.stewart@bham.ac.uk.

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Reference information: J Clin Invest. 2013;123(7):3051–3060. doi:10.1172/JCI64162.

References
  1. Newell-Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK. Cushing’s syndrome. Lancet. 2006;367(9522):1605–1617.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  2. Korting HC, Unholzer A, Schafer-Korting M, Tausch I, Gassmueller J, Nietsch KH. Different skin thinning potential of equipotent medium-strength glucocorticoids. Skin Pharmacol Appl Skin Physiol. 2002;15(2):85–91.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  3. Werth VP, Kligman AM, Shi XM, Pagnoni A. Lack of correlation of skin thickness with bone density in patients receiving chronic glucocorticoid. Arch Dermatol Res. 1998;290(7):388–393.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  4. Sowers JR, Lippman HR. Cushing’s syndrome due to ectopic ACTH production: cutaneous manifestations. Cutis. 1985;36(4):351–352.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  5. Stenzel-Poore MP, Cameron VA, Vaughan J, Sawchenko PE, Vale W. Development of Cushing’s syndrome in corticotropin-releasing factor transgenic mice. Endocrinology. 1992;130(6):3378–3386.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  6. Faergemann J, et al. Dose-response effects of tri-iodothyroacetic acid (Triac) and other thyroid hormone analogues on glucocorticoid-induced skin atrophy in the haired mouse. Acta Derm Venereol. 2002;82(3):179–183.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  7. Kimura T, Doi K. Dorsal skin reactions of hairless dogs to topical treatment with corticosteroids. Toxicol Pathol. 1999;27(5):528–535.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  8. Nuutinen P, et al. Modulation of collagen synthesis and mRNA by continuous and intermittent use of topical hydrocortisone in human skin. Br J Dermatol. 2003;148(1):39–45.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  9. Autio P, Oikarinen A, Melkko J, Risteli J, Risteli L. Systemic glucocorticoids decrease the synthesis of type I and type III collagen in human skin in vivo, whereas isotretinoin treatment has little effect. Br J Dermatol. 1994;131(5):660–663.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  10. Oishi Y, Fu ZW, Ohnuki Y, Kato H, Noguchi T. Molecular basis of the alteration in skin collagen metabolism in response to in vivo dexamethasone treatment: effects on the synthesis of collagen type I and III, collagenase, and tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases. Br J Dermatol. 2002;147(5):859–868.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  11. Schoepe S, Schacke H, May E, Asadullah K. Glucocorticoid therapy-induced skin atrophy. Exp Dermatol. 2006;15(6):406–420.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  12. Lee B, Vouthounis C, Stojadinovic O, Brem H, Im M, Tomic-Canic M. From an enhanceosome to a repressosome: molecular antagonism between glucocorticoids and EGF leads to inhibition of wound healing. J Mol Biol. 2005;345(5):1083–1097.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  13. Mercado AM, Padgett DA, Sheridan JF, Marucha PT. Altered kinetics of IL-1 alpha, IL-1 beta, and KGF-1 gene expression in early wounds of restrained mice. Brain Behav Immun. 2002;16(2):150–162.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  14. Aberg KM, et al. Psychological stress downregulates epidermal antimicrobial peptide expression and increases severity of cutaneous infections in mice. J Clin Invest. 2007;117(11):3339–3349.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  15. Lavker RM. Structural alterations in exposed and unexposed aged skin. J Invest Dermatol. 1979;73(1):59–66.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  16. Varani J, et al. Vitamin A antagonizes decreased cell growth and elevated collagen-degrading matrix metalloproteinases and stimulates collagen accumulation in naturally aged human skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2000;114(3):480–486.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  17. Braverman IM, Fonferko E. Studies in cutaneous aging: I. The elastic fiber network. J Invest Dermatol. 1982;78:434–443.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  18. Varani J, et al. Decreased collagen production in chronologically aged skin — roles of age-dependent alteration in fibroblast function and defective mechanical stimulation. Am J Pathol. 2006;168(6):1861–1868.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  19. Liang JA, Pei XR, Zhang ZF, Wang N, Wang JB, Li Y. The protective effects of long-term oral administration of marine collagen hydrolysate from chum salmon on collagen matrix homeostasis in the chronological aged skin of Sprague-Dawley male rats. J Food Sci. 2010;75(8):H230–H238.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  20. Sayama A, Soushin T, Okada T, Doi K, Nakayama H. Morphological and biochemical changes during aging and photoaging of the skin of C57BL/6J mice. J Toxicol Pathol. 2010;23(3):133–139.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  21. Ghadially R, Brown BE, Sequeiramartin SM, Feingold KR, Elias PM. The aged epidermal permeability barrier. Structural, functional, and lipid biochemical abnormalities in humans and a senescent murine model. J Clin Invest. 1995;95(5):2281–2290.
    View this article via: JCI PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  22. Escoffier C, Derigal J, Rochefort A, Vasselet R, Leveque JL, Agache PG. Age-related mechanical-properties of human-skin — an in vivo study. J Invest Dermatol. 1989;93(3):353–357.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  23. Ashcroft GS, Horan MA, Ferguson MWJ. Aging is associated with reduced deposition of specific extracellular matrix components, upregulation of angiogenesis, and an altered inflammatory response in a murine incisional wound healing model. J Invest Dermatol. 1997;108(4):430–437.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  24. Ballas CB, Davidson JM. Delayed wound healing in aged rats is associated with increased collagen gel remodeling and contraction by skin fibroblasts, not with differences in apoptotic or myofibroblast cell populations. Wound Repair Regen. 2001;9(3):223–237.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  25. Beauregard S, Gilchrest BA. A survey of skin problems and skin care regimens in the elderly. Arch Dermatol. 1987;123(12):1638–1643.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  26. Tiganescu A, Walker EA, Hardy RS, Mayes AE, Stewart PM. Localization, age- and site-dependent expression, and regulation of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in skin. J Invest Dermatol. 2011;131(1):30–36.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  27. Cooper MS, Rabbitt EH, Goddard PE, Bartlett WA, Hewison M, Stewart PM. Osteoblastic 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 activity increases with age and glucocorticoid exposure. J Bone Miner Res. 2002;17(6):979–986.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  28. Zhang TY, Ding XH, Daynes RA. The expression of 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type I by lymphocytes provides a novel means for intracrine regulation of glucocorticoid activities. J Immunol. 2005;174(2):879–889.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  29. Weinstein RS, et al. Endogenous glucocorticoids decrease skeletal angiogenesis, vascularity, hydration, and strength in aged mice. Aging Cell. 2010;9(2):147–161.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  30. Holmes MC, et al. 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 expression is increased in the aged mouse hippocampus and parietal cortex and causes memory impairments. J Neurosci. 2010;30(20):6916–6920.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  31. Andersson T, et al. Tissue-specific increases in 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 in normal weight postmenopausal women. PloS One. 2009;4(12):e8475.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  32. Yau JLW, et al. Enhanced hippocampal long-term potentiation and spatial learning in aged 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 knock-out mice. J Neurosci. 2007;27(39):10487–10496.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  33. Sooy K, et al. Partial deficiency or short-term inhibition of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 improves cognitive function in aging mice. J Neurosci. 2010;30(41):13867–13872.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  34. Mohler EG, et al. Acute inhibition of 11beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type-1 improves memory in rodent models of cognition. J Neurosci. 2011;31(14):5406–5413.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  35. Damodarasamy M, et al. Collagen extracts derived from young and aged mice demonstrate different structural properties and cellular effects in three-dimensional gels. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2010;65(3):209–218.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  36. Vedrenne N, Coulomb B, Danigo A, Bonté F, Desmoulière A. The complex dialogue between (myo)fibroblasts and the extracellular matrix during skin repair processes and aging. Pathol Biol (Paris). 2012;60(1):20–27.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  37. Cretu A, Brooks PC. Impact of the non-cellular tumor microenvironment on metastasis: Potential therapeutic and imaging opportunities. J Cell Physiol. 2007;213(2):391–402.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  38. Willhauck MJ, et al. Reversion of tumor phenotype in surface transplants of skin SCC cells by scaffold-induced stroma modulation. Carcinogenesis. 2007;28(3):595–610.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  39. Bernstein EF, et al. Long-term sun exposure alters the collagen of the papillary dermis. Comparison of sun-protected and photoaged skin by northern analysis, immunohistochemical staining, and confocal laser scanning microscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1996;34(2 pt 1):209–218.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  40. Cutroneo KR, Counts DF. Anti-inflammatory steroids and collagen metabolism: glucocorticoid-mediated alterations of prolyl hydroxylase activity and collagen synthesis. Mol Pharmacol. 1975;11(5):632–639.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  41. Benson SC, Luvalle PA. Inhibition of lysyl oxidase and prolyl hydroxylase activity in glucocorticoid treated rats. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1981;99(2):557–562.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  42. Vranka JA, et al. Prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1 null mice display abnormalities in fibrillar collagen-rich tissues such as tendons, skin, and bones. J Biol Chem. 2010;285(22):17253–17262.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  43. Cabral WA, et al. Prolyl 3-hydroxylase 1 deficiency causes a recessive metabolic bone disorder resembling lethal/severe osteogenesis imperfecta. Nat Genet. 2007;39(3):359–365.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  44. Willaert A, et al. Recessive osteogenesis imperfecta caused by LEPRE1 mutations: clinical documentation and identification of the splice form responsible for prolyl 3-hydroxylation. J Med Genet. 2009;46(4):233–241.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  45. Yeowell HN, Walker LC. Mutations in the lysyl hydroxylase 1 gene that result in enzyme deficiency and the clinical phenotype of Ehlers-Danlos syndrome type VI. Mol Genet Metab. 2000;71(1–2):212–224.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  46. van der Slot AJ, et al. Identification of PLOD2 as telopeptide lysyl hydroxylase, an important enzyme in fibrosis. J Biol Chem. 2003;278(42):40967–40972.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  47. Bank RA, et al. Defective collagen crosslinking in bone, but not in ligament or cartilage, in Bruck syndrome: Indications for a bone-specific telopeptide lysyl hydroxylase on chromosome 17. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(3):1054–1058.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  48. Kuivaniemi H, Peltonen L, Kivirikko KI. Type IX Ehlers-Danlos syndrome and Menkes syndrome: the decrease in lysyl oxidase activity is associated with a corresponding deficiency in the enzyme protein. Am J Hum Genet. 1985;37(4):798–808.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  49. Bauer EA, Kronberger A, Valle KJ, Jeffrey JJ, Eisen AZ. Glucocorticoid modulation of collagenase expression in human skin fibroblast cultures. Evidence for pre-translational inhibition. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1985;825(2):227–235.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  50. Madlener M, Mauch C, Conca W, Brauchle M, Parks WC, Werner S. Regulation of the expression of stromelysin-2 by growth factors in keratinocytes: implications for normal and impaired wound healing. Biochem J. 1996;320:659–664.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  51. Bigg HF, et al. Tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases-4 inhibits but does not support the activation of gelatinase A via efficient inhibition of membrane type I-matrix metalloproteinase. Cancer Res. 2001;61(9):3610–3618.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  52. Varani J, et al. Inhibition of type I procollagen synthesis by damaged collagen in photoaged skin and by collagenase-degraded collagen in vitro. Am J Pathol. 2001;158(3):931–942.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  53. Hollis G, Huber R. 11 beta-Hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibition in type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(1):1–6.
    View this article via: PubMed Google Scholar
  54. Feig PU, et al. Effects of an 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor, MK-0916, in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2011;13(6):498–504.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  55. Gibbs JP, et al. Population pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic model of subcutaneous adipose 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 (11β-HSD1) activity after oral administration of AMG 221, a selective 11β-HSD1 inhibitor. J Clin Pharmacol. 2011;51(6):830–841.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  56. Park JS, et al. Anti-diabetic and anti-adipogenic effects of a novel selective 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor, 2-(3-benzoyl)-4-hydroxy-1,1-dioxo-2H-1,2-benzothiazine-2-yl-1-phenylethanone (KR-66344). Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;81(8):1028–1035.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  57. Liu J, et al. Adipose tissue-targeted 11 beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 inhibitor protects against diet-induced obesity. Endocr J. 2011;58(3):199–209.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  58. Semjonous NM, et al. Hexose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase contributes to skeletal muscle homeostasis independent of 11β-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1. Endocrinology. 2011;152(1):93–102.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef Google Scholar
  59. Fuerst-Recktenwald S, Abt M, Arlt W. Effects of two 11β-HSD1 inhibitors on the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenal axis of male and female Type 2 diabetic patients. Endocr Rev. 2011;32(03_MeetingAbstracts):OR39-4.
Version history
  • Version 1 (June 3, 2013): No description
  • Version 2 (June 3, 2013): No description
  • Version 3 (July 1, 2013): No description

Article tools

  • View PDF
  • Download citation information
  • Send a comment
  • Terms of use
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Need help? Email the journal

Metrics

  • Article usage
  • Citations to this article

Go to

  • Top
  • Abstract
  • Introduction
  • Results
  • Discussion
  • Methods
  • Supplemental material
  • Acknowledgments
  • Footnotes
  • References
  • Version history
Advertisement
Advertisement

Copyright © 2025 American Society for Clinical Investigation
ISSN: 0021-9738 (print), 1558-8238 (online)

Sign up for email alerts