Department of Medicine and Institute for Translational Medicine and Therapeutics, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Address correspondence to: Daniel J. Rader, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, 11-125 Translational Research Center, 3400 Civic Center Blvd., Building 421, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-5158, USA. Phone: 215.573.4176; Fax: 215.573.8606; E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org.
First published December 27, 2011 - More info
See the related article beginning on page 70.
Inflammation is a critical component of atherosclerosis. IL-1 is a classic proinflammatory cytokine that has been linked to atherosclerosis. A clinical trial has been launched in which an antibody specific for IL-1β is being studied for its effects on cardiovascular events in patients with atherosclerosis. In this issue of the JCI, Alexander et al. report that mice lacking the receptor for IL-1 unexpectedly have features of advanced atherosclerosis that suggest the atherosclerotic plaques may be less stable. These findings illustrate the complexity of inflammatory pathways in atherosclerosis and suggest the need for careful calibration of antiinflammatory approaches to atherosclerosis.
Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of death in the United States for both men and women. CAD is caused by the progressive formation in the coronary arteries of atherosclerotic plaques that are characterized by the accumulation of lipids, in particular cholesterol and its derivatives, and inflammatory cells. In the early stages of disease development, the atherosclerotic plaques are small, lipid rich, and asymptomatic. Over time, they mature into advanced atherosclerotic plaques, with increased content of vascular smooth muscle cells, extracellular matrix, and inflammatory markers, and gain characteristics that may have clinical consequences. Clinical symptoms can arise from plaques causing flow-limiting stenoses, although the process of compensatory remodeling involving expansion of the vessel can help to protect against this. The more clinically important consequence of coronary atherosclerosis is the rupture or disruption of a “vulnerable” plaque. Plaque rupture leads to prothrombotic material in the plaque becoming exposed to the blood and to thrombosis, resulting in acute coronary events, including myocardial infarction and death. There has been substantial interest in identifying pathways that lead to plaque instability and in the development of novel therapies that stabilize the vulnerable plaque and reduce acute coronary events (1).
Inflammation plays a key role in all stages of atherogenesis, from recruitment of monocytes and other leukocytes to growth of the plaque to plaque rupture and thrombosis (1, 2). A variety of inflammatory pathways have been associated with human atherosclerosis, and such links have been investigated extensively in mouse models of atherogenesis (3). A remarkable number of inflammatory mediators — including a myriad of cytokines and their receptors, chemokines and their receptors, and intracellular signaling molecules — have been shown when deleted from the mouse genome to influence plaque size, often (but not always) in the direction of reduced atherosclerosis when the relevant inflammatory pathway is interrupted (3). However, the relevance of these studies to human atherosclerosis remains uncertain in the absence of direct interventional randomized controlled trials in humans.
There has been interest for several years in the potential role of the proinflammatory cytokine IL-1 in atherogenesis (4). Both IL-1α and IL-1β activate IL-1 receptor type I (IL-1R1), and IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1ra) competitively inhibits their binding. IL-1α remains associated with the plasma membrane, whereas IL-1β is fully secreted and can act on IL-1R1 on cells distant from the cell of origin. Thus IL-1β has been thought to be of greater relevance to human inflammatory diseases.
Recently there has been considerable interest in the inflammasome, a multimolecular cellular complex containing nucleotide-binding domain–, leucine-rich repeat–, and pyrin domain–containing receptors (NLRPs). The inflammasome responds to endogenous danger signals by activating caspase-1, which in turn converts pro–IL-1β into the mature active form (Figure 1 and refs. 5, 6). Certain genetic mutations affecting proteins of the NLRP3 inflammasome cause rare autoinflammatory disorders characterized by excessive IL-1β production (e.g., Muckle-Wells syndrome and familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome; ref. 7); IL-1β inhibition appears to be efficacious in these settings (8). More common conditions are also characterized by activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome and excessive production of IL-1β. For example, urate crystals in the joint activate NLRP3 and drive IL-1β production, leading to acute gout (9). Thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP), expression of which is upregulated by glucose, is a direct ligand for and activates NLRP3 and thus promotes IL-1β production, possibly exacerbating type 2 diabetes (10). Indeed, anti–IL-1 therapies have been shown to have some efficacy in type 2 diabetes (11, 12).
Role of the NLRP3 inflammasome and IL-1β in atherosclerosis. Extracellular cholesterol crystals act as a “danger signal” and activate the NLRP3 inflammasome, which triggers activation of caspase-1, leading to cleavage of pro–IL-1β to its active form. The active form of IL-1β is then secreted from the cell, where it mediates autocrine and paracrine effects through activation of the IL-1R1.
Because atherosclerosis is a chronic inflammatory condition that IL-1β has been linked to in the past (4, 13), it was of high interest when, in 2010, two publications implicated the NLRP3 inflammasome in atherosclerosis by demonstrating that cholesterol crystals activate the NLRP3 inflammasome and generate IL-1β production (Figure 1 and refs. 14, 15). Atherosclerosis-prone mice reconstituted with bone marrow from NLRP3-deficient or IL-1β–deficient mice were shown to have less atherosclerosis (14), consistent with a causal role for this pathway in promoting atherogenesis. This observation garnered considerable interest because of a clear pathway linking the inflammasome to atherosclerosis and the implications for novel therapeutic approaches (10, 16, 17).
Spurred by the data linking the NLRP3 inflammasome/IL-1β pathway to atherogenesis (12, 13) and earlier work indicating a causal role for IL-1β in promoting atherosclerosis in mice (18, 19), an ambitious clinical trial was recently launched. Canakinumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody specific for IL-1β that is efficacious against and currently approved for autoinflammatory disorders driven by excess IL-1β (including Muckle-Wells syndrome and familial cold autoinflammatory syndrome) (8). The Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS) is designed to test the hypothesis that IL-1β inhibition will reduce major cardiovascular events in persons with preexisting CAD (20). Because of uncertainty about the optimal degree of IL-1β inhibition needed to achieve cardiovascular event reduction with acceptable safety, canakinumab will be tested at three different doses compared with placebo, for a total of four parallel arms in a study planned to enroll more than 17,000 subjects. This trial is the first true test of the hypothesis that interrupting an inflammatory pathway involved in atherosclerosis will reduce cardiovascular events.
Given the initiation of the CANTOS trial, the paper by Alexander et al. in this issue of the JCI (21) is of considerable interest. The authors investigated the effects of deletion of the gene encoding IL-1R1 on advanced atherosclerotic plaques in atherosclerosis-prone ApoE-deficient mice fed a high-fat diet for up to 30 weeks. Consistent with previous reports (18, 22) and the authors’ a priori hypothesis, overall plaque size in the aortic root (the traditional location for assessment of mouse atherosclerosis) was reduced in mice lacking IL-1R1, supporting a role for IL-1 signaling in promoting plaque growth in the mouse (21). However, the authors also examined the brachiocephalic artery, another site of atherosclerosis in disease-prone mice. Unexpectedly, the authors found in the IL-1R1–deficient mice that plaque size was not reduced and, furthermore, that the atherosclerotic vessels had reduced lumen size as a result of reduced outward vessel remodeling. Upon examination of the aortic roots, the same observation of impaired outward remodeling was made. In addition, plaques at both sites demonstrated reduced vascular smooth muscle cell and collagen content and increased intraplaque hemorrhage, all markers associated with plaque instability on autopsy of human coronary arteries. Alexander and colleagues further provided data suggesting that IL-1 signaling increases expression of matrix metalloproteinase 3 (MMP3) and that relative deficiency of MMP3 in the IL-1R1–deficient animals may have contributed to the observed atherosclerotic vascular phenotypes. These results in mice could be interpreted to be consistent with a protective role of IL-1 signaling in advanced atherosclerotic plaques.
Should the findings of Alexander et al. (21) lead to concern about the clinical trial of the IL-1β–specific antibody canakinumab in subjects with CAD? There are a number of reasons to be cautious about extrapolating these results in mice to the implications of inhibiting IL-1β in humans. First, Alexander et al. used mice with complete genetic deletion of the gene encoding IL-1R1, whereas the clinical trial utilizes antibody inhibition of one of the ligands for this receptor, IL-1β. There may be important biological differences between complete genetic abrogation of IL-1R1 signaling and partial antibody inhibition of the IL-1β ligand. Second, Alexander et al. used germ-line deletion of the gene encoding IL-1R1 from early prenatal development, whereas the clinical trial utilizes antibody inhibition of IL-1β in adults with preexisting CAD. Early loss of IL-1R1 signaling might have led to compensatory changes that could have influenced the reported phenotype. A genetic experiment in mice that comes closer to mimicking the human trial would be to induce deletion of the gene encoding IL-1R1 (or, preferably, that encoding IL-1β itself) in mice with established atherosclerotic lesions. Finally, while many important insights have been gained from the study of atherosclerosis in mice, there remains to this day no bona fide model of plaque rupture in mice that reproduces the pathophysiological events that underlie acute myocardial infarction and other acute coronary syndromes in humans. Thus, the field is dependent on careful histological characterization of atherosclerotic lesions in mice and comparisons with similar histologic findings in humans. For example, while the histological findings of Alexander et al. were unexpectedly interesting (21), the mice lacking IL-1R1 were not shown to have increased plaque rupture or to develop acute myocardial infarction. However, the findings are certainly provocative and hypothesis generating. They affirm the wisdom of studying three different doses of canakinumab in the CANTOS trial and suggest that MMP3 might be an interesting biomarker to measure with regard to correlation with outcomes. More broadly, the work of Alexander et al. (21) illustrates the complexity of the interrelationships between inflammatory pathways and atherosclerosis and rebuts the notion that all inflammation is by its nature proatherogenic.
In summary, the CANTOS trial of canakinumab for inhibition of IL-1β in patients with CAD to test the effects of this biologic on cardiovascular events is the first direct test of the “inflammation hypothesis” in human atherosclerosis. While the study of Alexander et al. (21) has revealed additional complexities with regard to the role of IL-1 signaling in advanced atherosclerosis, the ongoing clinical trial should provide a definitive test of whether — and to what degree — interruption of IL-1β signaling in atherosclerosis will reduce cardiovascular events.
The author is funded by grants from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute and the Leducq Foundation.
Conflict of interest: Daniel J. Rader declares a conflict of interest with Aegerion, Merck, Novartis, and Pfizer.
Citation for this article:J Clin Invest. 2012;122(1):27–30. doi:10.1172/JCI61163.
See the related article beginning on page 70.