Osteopathy and resistance to vitamin D toxicity in mice null for vitamin D binding protein
J. Clin. Invest. Fayez F. Safadi, et al. 103:239 doi:10.1172/JCI5244 [
Go to this article.]

Figure 4Bone mineralization defect after mild dietary vitamin D deficiency in DBP
–/– mice. Sections of femurs from age- and sex-matched groups of vitamin D–deficient (vitamin D
−) DBP
+/+ and DBP
–/– mice were stained with Masson's trichrome. Representative photomicrographs from a DBP
+/+ (
a) and a DBP
–/– (
b) mouse are shown. Osteoid seams were characteristically thicker in the DBP
–/– group (
arrowhead). This difference was not observed in mice fed vitamin D–sufficient chow. (
c–f) Quantitative histomorphometric analyses of mice on vitamin D–deficient diets demonstrated significant abnormalities in OS/BS (male animals,
n = 5; trend similar among females, but not significant;
c) and osteoid thickness (both sexes compared,
n = 10;
d) in DBP
–/– mice. The bones of mice from both groups were labeled by two injections of the fluorochrome (calcein) at a 7-day interval, and bone sections were subjected to quantitative histomorphometric analyses to determine the amount of mineralization during this period. The MAR (both sexes compared,
n = 7, 8;
e) and the MS/BS (both sexes compared,
n = 6;
f) were indicative of a quantitative mineralization defect in DBP
–/– mice. DBP
+/+ and DBP
–/– mice maintained on normal diets showed no significant differences in any of these parameters (not shown).
MAR, mineral apposition rate;
MS/BS, mineralizing surface/bone surface;
OS/BS, osteoid surface/bone surface.