Article tools
  • View PDF
  • Cite this article
  • E-mail this article
  • Send a letter
  • Information on reuse
  • Standard abbreviations
  • Article usage
Author information
Need help?

Commentary

Integral role of integrins in Th17 development

Derek A. Pociask and Jay K. Kolls

Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University, Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.

Address correspondence to: Jay K. Kolls, Department of Genetics, Louisiana State University Health Sciences Center, New Orleans, Louisiana 70112, USA. Phone: 504.568.6117; Fax: 504.568.8500; E-mail: jkolls@lsuhsc.edu.

First published November 22, 2010

A lineage of CD4+ T cells known as Th17 cells, which are derived by exposure of naive CD4+ T cells to IL-6 and TGF-β, have been implicated in several autoimmune diseases. In this issue of the JCI, studies by Acharya et al. and Melton et al. show that TGF-β is activated at the DC/CD4+ T cell synapse by αv integrins and that this activation is required for Th17 differentiation and autoimmunity in the central nervous system. Thus, these studies offer a potential therapeutic target in fighting autoimmune diseases.

See the related articles beginning on pages 4436 and 4445.

Th17 cells are a recently identified and critical component of the adaptive immune system (13). They are characterized by the production of IL-17A and IL-17F as well as other cytokines such as IL-22. These effector cytokines have been shown to be critical for clearance of certain bacteria and fungal pathogens (4). In addition, vaccine-induced Th17 cells have been shown to have broad protective roles against extracellular pathogens such as Streptococcus pneumoniae and to control Th1 cell migration in the context of vaccination against the intracellular pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (4). However, this protective aspect of the Th17 lineage comes at a cost, as these cells have been implicated in autoimmune diseases such as multiple sclerosis, psoriasis, and rheumatoid arthritis (13).

Several groups have shown that naive CD4+ T cells differentiate into Tregs in the presence of TGF-β (5, 6). However, in the presence of TGF-β and IL-6, naive CD4+ T cells differentiate into Th17 cells (68). Early work by Li et al. (9) showed that the source of TGF-β in this context was the CD4+ T cell. However, TGF-β is secreted from cells in an inactive form, in which bioactive TGF-β is in a complex with its latency-associated peptide (LAP) through noncovalent bonds. Two studies in this issue of the JCI demonstrate that DCs activate TGF-β in an integrin-dependent fashion (10, 11), suggesting that the activation of TGF-β occurs at the DC/T cell synapse (Figure 1) and that this activation is required to drive the differentiation of Th17 T cells.

Schematic representation of Th17 differentiation.Figure 1

Schematic representation of Th17 differentiation. Two studies in this issue of the JCI (10, 11) demonstrate that TGF-β is activated at the DC/CD4+ T cell synapse by αv integrins and that this activation is required for Th17 differentiation in vitro. Moreover, mice lacking αv integrins on DCs fail to develop EAE, a disease mediated by Th17 cells.

TGF-β and integrins

TGF-β is a multifunctional cytokine involved in many aspects of immunology, angiogenesis, and epithelial growth as well as in pathogenic states such as fibrosis (12). Activation of TGF-β has been an area of intense study. Mechanisms identified as leading to the disruption of the noncovalent interaction between LAP and bioactive TGF-β and thus activation of TGF-β include low pH, heat, reactive oxygen species produced as a result of environmental exposures, and LAP cleavage by proteases such as thrombin, elastase, MMP-2, and MMP-9 (13). Because of the ubiquitous expression of TGF-β by many cell types, indiscriminate activation of TGF-β is not advantageous. A more spatially regulated activation occurs through latent TGF-β binding to integrins at the cell surface, which allows activation of TGF-β in a more regulated and localized manner (13).

Integrins are a family of heterodimeric cell surface receptors consisting of an α and a β subunit. There are 24 total integrin subunits (18 α and 6 β). Among the integrins, five share the αv subunit (αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8) and are capable of binding the RGD tripeptide sequence on the LAP of TGF-β (1). Studies in mice that have a mutation converting the RGD sequence of LAP to RGE demonstrate the same embryonic lethality and inflammatory phenotype as mice lacking TGF-β (14), suggesting integrin-mediated activation of TGF-β is critical in development. There are two proposed mechanisms of integrin-dependant activation of TGF-β. In the case of integrins that are bound to the cytoskeleton, such as integrin αvβ6, binding of TGF-β induces a conformational change upon the latent complex of TGF-β, allowing the active portion of TGF-β to be exposed to its receptor, without breaking the LAP/TGF-β bonds (15). Integrin αvβ8 lacks this cytoskeletal connection. In its case, the integrin acts as an anchor for TGF-β, allowing proteolysis by membrane-bound MMP-14 (also known as mt1-MMP) (16). Both of these integrin-related mechanisms allow TGF-β to be activated in a very focal manner, which may be important in the context of Th17 differentiation.

Integrin-mediated Th17 development

In this issue of the JCI, two complimentary papers demonstrate the requirement of integrin αvβ8 activation of TGF-β in the differentiation of Th17 cells (10, 11). Previous work using conditional knockout mice has shown that mice lacking either αv (17) or αvβ8 (18) in myeloid cells develop colitis and a spontaneous autoimmune disease, believed to be due to the inability of these mice to activate TGF-β and develop Tregs. Acharya et al. (10) have now considered the common requirement for TGF-β in the development of Tregs and Th17 cells and find that conditional knockout mice (which they generated using tie2-cre and termed αv-tie2 mice) that lack integrin αv on all hematopoietic cells have reduced proportions of Th17 cells in the lamina propria. However, CD4+ T cells from these mice were capable of differentiating into Th17 cells when supplied with exogenous TGF-β in vitro (10). By crossing mice with a floxed Itgav allele (i.e., the allele that encodes αv) to LysM-cre mice, which allowed expression of αv integrins on lymphoid cells but not on macrophages and DCs, the authors demonstrated that integrin αv expression on LysM-expressing cells was required for the TGF-β activation that is required for Th17 cell generation in αv-tie2 mice (10). While these data demonstrate the importance of αv, they do not completely identify which integrin is responsible, as mice lacking αv are incapable of making αvβ1, αvβ3, αvβ5, αvβ6, and αvβ8. In support of this work, Melton et al. (11) show a similar phenotype of markedly reduced numbers of Th17 cells in the lamina propria of mice lacking integrin β8 expression on DCs (mice that they term β8fl/fl × CD11c-cre mice) (11). Using the experimental model of autoimmune encephalitis (EAE), which is Th17 dependant, neither the αv-tie2 mice (10) nor the β8fl/fl × CD11c-cre mice developed EAE (11). To understand what role integrin αvβ8 may have in Th17 development, both groups looked at cytokines involved in Th17 polarization. There were no differences in IL-6, IL-23, TGF-β (10, 11), or IL-1β (10) expression after immunization in the EAE model. Further, IFN-γ, which inhibits Th17 development, was not increased in β8fl/fl × CD11c-cre mice, and, thus, the reduced Th17 polarization in vivo could not be explained by enhanced Th1 polarization (11). In vitro, both groups of investigators showed that DCs were required to activate TGF-β, as naive CD4+ T cells did not differentiate in the presence of latent TGF-β unless DCs were present (10, 11). Further, this activation did not occur in the presence of DCs from either αv-tie2 or β8fl/fl × CD11c-cre mice or in the presence of RGD mimetics (10) or TGF-β antibodies (11). Interestingly, this activation required cognate interaction between the CD4+ T cells and DCs (Figure 1), as MHC class II–mismatched DCs, which are unable to present antigen to T cells, did not induce Th17 differentiation (10, 11).

Conclusions

Given the importance of IL-17 in autoimmune disease, the mechanisms of Th17 differentiation are under extensive study. The works presented by Acharya et al. (10) and Melton et al. (11) demonstrate a novel mechanism for the development of Th17 cells, in which naive CD4+ T cells recognize antigens presented by DCs in an MHC class II–dependent manner, while at the same time inducing the cell to differentiate to a Th17 cell through the activation of TGF-β by an integrin αvβ8–dependant mechanism (Figure 1). While these studies do not explain the production of IL-17 by other sources, such as γδ T cells, they do offer insight into the development of an important cell lineage that is implicated in autoimmune states. They also suggest the use of RGD mimetics to block the activation of TGF-β could be a feasible therapy to reduce the severity of Th17-related diseases. Recently, however, work by Ghoreschi et al. demonstrates that Th17 cells can develop in the absence of TGF-β, and Th17 cells grown in these conditions show enhanced pathogenic potential after adoptive transfer (19). These data highlight the complexities of Th17 differentiation and suggest that it will be important to understand the origins and phenotypes of Th17 cells (and their nuanced subsets) in order to develop therapeutic approaches.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge support from the following Public Health Service grants: 5R01HL079142 (to D.A. Pociask and J.K. Kolls) and P50HL084932 (to J.K. Kolls).

Footnotes

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared that no conflict of interest exists.

Citation for this article:J Clin Invest. 2010;120(12):4185–4187. doi:10.1172/JCI45450.

See the related articles beginning on pages 4436 and 4445.

References

  1. Weaver CT, Hatton RD, Mangan PR, Harrington LE. IL-17 family cytokines and the expanding diversity of effector T cell lineages. Annu Rev Immunol. 2007;25:821–852.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  2. Korn T, Bettelli E, Oukka M, Kuchroo VK. IL-17 and Th17 cells. Annu Rev Immunol. 2009;27:485–517.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  3. Dong C. TH17 cells in development: an updated view of their molecular identity and genetic programming. Nat Rev Immunol. 2008;8(5):337–348.
    View this article via: PubMed
  4. Khader SA, Gaffen SL, Kolls JK. Th17 cells at the crossroads of innate and adaptive immunity against infectious diseases at the mucosa. Mucosal Immunol. 2009;2(5):403–411.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  5. Shevach EM. Mechanisms of foxp3+ T regulatory cell-mediated suppression. Immunity. 2009;30(5):636–645.
    View this article via: PubMed
  6. Bettelli E, et al. Reciprocal developmental pathways for the generation of pathogenic effector TH17 and regulatory T cells. Nature. 2006;441(7090):235–238.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  7. Mangan PR, et al. Transforming growth factor-β induces development of the TH17 lineage. Nature. 2006;441(7090):231–234.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  8. Veldhoen M, Hocking RJ, Atkins CJ, Locksley RM, Stockinger B. TGFbeta in the context of an inflammatory cytokine milieu supports de novo differentiation of IL-17-producing T cells. Immunity. 2006;24(2):179–189.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  9. Li MO, Wan YY, Flavell RA. T cell-produced transforming growth factor-beta1 controls T cell tolerance and regulates Th1- and Th17-cell differentiation. Immunity. 2007;26(5):579–591.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  10. Acharya M, et al. αv Integrin expression by DCs is required for Th17 cell differentiation and development of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(12):4445–4452.
    View this article via: JCI.org CrossRef
  11. Melton AC, Bailey-Bucktrout SL, Travis MA, Fife BT, Bluestone JA, Sheppard D. Expression of αVβ8 integrin on dendritic cells regulates Th17 cell development and experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis in mice. J Clin Invest. 2010;120(12):4436–4444.
    View this article via: JCI.org CrossRef
  12. Mantel PY, Schmidt-Weber CB. Transforming growth factor-beta: recent advances on its role in immune tolerance. Methods Mol Biol. 2011;677:303–338.
    View this article via: PubMed
  13. Annes JP, Munger JS, Rifkin DB. Making sense of latent TGFbeta activation. J Cell Sci. 2003;116(pt 2):217–224.
    View this article via: PubMed
  14. Yang Z, et al. Absence of integrin-mediated TGFbeta1 activation in vivo recapitulates the phenotype of TGFbeta1-null mice. J Cell Biol. 2007;176(6):787–793.
    View this article via: PubMed
  15. Munger JS, et al. The integrin alpha v beta 6 binds and activates latent TGF beta 1: a mechanism for regulating pulmonary inflammation and fibrosis. Cell. 1999;96(3):319–328.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  16. Mu D, et al. The integrin alpha(v)beta8 mediates epithelial homeostasis through MT1-MMP-dependent activation of TGF-beta1. J Cell Biol. 2002;157(3):493–507.
    View this article via: PubMed
  17. Lacy-Hulbert A, et al. Ulcerative colitis and autoimmunity induced by loss of myeloid alphav integrins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104(40):15823–15828.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  18. Travis MA, et al. Loss of integrin alpha(v)beta8 on dendritic cells causes autoimmunity and colitis in mice. Nature. 2007;449(7160):361–365.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
  19. Ghoreschi K, et al. Generation of pathogenic T(H)17 cells in the absence of TGF-beta signalling. Nature. 2010;467(7318):967–971.
    View this article via: PubMed CrossRef
Advertisement