Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Roger P.M. Sutmuller, Martijn H.M.G.M. den Brok, Matthijs Kramer, Erik J. Bennink, Liza W.J. Toonen, Bart-Jan Kullberg, Leo A. Joosten, Shizuo Akira, Mihai G. Netea, Gosse J. Adema
Published in Volume 116, Issue 2
J Clin Invest. 2006; 116(2):485–494 doi:10.1172/JCI25439
Abstract | Full text | PDF | Supplemental material
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3
PAM induces CD25 expression through TLR2 signaling.

Below each graph, the specific T cell stimulation is indicated. (A) TLR2 and MyD88 expression is required for PAM-mediated increase of CD25 expression. Purified WT, TLR2–/–, and MyD88–/– CD4+CD25+ T cells were cultured for 3 days with anti-CD3, IL-2 (medium control), or with the addition of PAM. Subsequently, the cells were harvested and CD25 expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. Values indicate average MFI from triplicate wells ± SD. *P < 0.02 with medium control. A representative result of 3 experiments is shown. (B) High numbers of WT APCs are required to increase CD25 expression on TLR2–/– Tregs. Purified CD4+CD25+ T cells from TLR2 –/– mice were incubated for 3 days with increasing amounts of WT APCs plus the TLR2 ligand PAM and anti-CD3, and subsequently, CD25 expression was analyzed by flow cytometry. Values indicate average MFI from triplicates ± SD. **P < 0.05 with medium control. (C) Proliferation of CFSE-labeled freshly isolated WT and TLR2–/– Tregs after stimulation with soluble anti-CD3, IL-2, and PAM. After 4 days, proliferation resulting in a decrease of fluorescent signal in the daughter cells was analyzed by flow cytometry and ModFit analysis software. Representative results of 2 experiments are shown.