Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Leander Grode, Peter Seiler, Sven Baumann, Jürgen Hess, Volker Brinkmann, Ali Nasser Eddine, Peggy Mann, Christian Goosmann, Silke Bandermann, Debbie Smith, Gregory J. Bancroft, Jean-Marc Reyrat, Dick van Soolingen, Bärbel Raupach, Stefan H.E. Kaufmann
Published in Volume 115, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 2005; 115(9):2472–2479 doi:10.1172/JCI24617
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 5

Antigen presence in the cytosol. (AD) Bone marrow macrophages infected for 24 hours with ΔureC hly+ rBCG (A and B) and parental BCG (C and D). The images are projections of 2 confocal planes from specimens stained for BCG (green), F-actin (red), and DNA (blue) (overlay in A and C). Material stained with an antibody raised against BCG is dispersed throughout the cytoplasm in cells infected with ΔureC hly+ rBCG while BCG material is exclusively located in bacteria within cells infected with parental BCG. Scale bar in AD: 10 μm. (E and F) Fine structural analysis of mycobacterial localization in bone marrow macrophages 24 hours after infection with ΔureC hly+ rBCG (E) and parental BCG (F). Panel E shows strong staining of a bacterium in a phagosome; additional staining for mycobacterial material was found in the cytoplasm (indicated by an arrow). However, cytoplasmic staining was greatly reduced in cells infected with parental BCG (F). Quantification of the density of immunogold signal in the cytoplasm of infected cells: parental BCG, 3.5 ± 2.3 gold particles/μm2; ΔureC hly+ rBCG, 7.0 ± 3.7 gold particles/μm2; P = 0.022 (Mann-Whitney U test). Scale bar in E and F: 1 μm.