Jennifer A. Hendrix, Brian R. Wamhoff, Oliver G. McDonald, Sanjay Sinha, Tadashi Yoshida, Gary K. Owens
J Clin Invest. 2005;
115(2):418
doi:10.1172/JCI22648
Abstract |
Full text
|
PDF

C
C(A/T)6GG–dependent (CArG-dependent) and serum response factor–dependent (SRF-dependent) mechanisms are required for gene expression in smooth muscle cells (SMCs). However, an unusual feature of many SMC-selective promoter CArG elements is that they contain a conserved single G or C substitution in their central A/T-rich region, which reduces binding affinity for ubiquitously expressed SRF. We hypothesized that this CArG degeneracy contributes to cell-specific expression of smooth muscle α-actin in vivo, since substitution of c-fos consensus CArGs for the degenerate CArGs resulted in relaxed specificity in cultured cells. Surprisingly, our present results show that these substitutions have no effect on smooth muscle–specific transgene expression during normal development and maturation in transgenic mice. However, these substitutions significantly attenuated injury-induced downregulation of the mutant transgene under conditions where SRF expression was increased but expression of myocardin, a smooth muscle–selective SRF coactivator, was decreased. Finally, chromatin immunoprecipitation analyses, together with cell culture studies, suggested that myocardin selectively enhanced SRF binding to degenerate versus consensus CArG elements. Our results indicate that reductions in myocardin expression and the degeneracy of CArG elements within smooth muscle promoters play a key role in phenotypic switching of smooth muscle cells in vivo, as well as in mediating responses of CArG-dependent smooth muscle genes and growth regulatory genes under conditions in which these 2 classes of genes are differentially expressed.
This citation data is accumulated from
CrossRef, which receives citation information from participating publishers, including this journal.
Not all publishers participate in CrossRef, so this information is not comprehensive.
Additionally, data may not reflect the most current citations to this article,
and the data may differ from citation information available from other sources
(for example, Google Scholar, Web of Science, and Scopus).