Jci_page_head_homepage_01 Jci_page_head_homepage_02
Gilles Faury, Mylène Pezet, Russell H. Knutsen, Walter A. Boyle, Scott P. Heximer, Sean E. McLean, Robert K. Minkes, Kendall J. Blumer, Attila Kovacs, Daniel P. Kelly, Dean Y. Li, Barry Starcher, Robert P. Mecham
Published in Volume 112, Issue 9
J Clin Invest. 2003; 112(9):1419–1428 doi:10.1172/JCI19028
Abstract | Full text | PDF
Options: View larger image (or click on image)
Medium
Figure 3

Reactivity of artery segments. Effect of PE and Ach (5 μM, except for the renal artery, which is 1.5 μM) on the ID of the ascending aorta (a), the abdominal aorta (b), the carotid artery (c), and the renal artery (d). Control is untreated vessel. Values for the Eln+/– vessel have been normalized to Eln+/+ control. *Significant difference (P ≤ 0.05, LSD test) between Eln+/+ and Eln+/– vessel responsiveness. #Significant difference (P ≤ 0.05, LSD test) from the corresponding control vessel. Mean values ± SEM, n = 4–8 for each vessel type. Gray bars, Eln+/+; white bars, Eln+/–.