Addisonian patients can maintain potassium homeostasis despite the absence of mineralocorticoid. The present in vitro microperfusion studies examine what role the cortical collecting tubule might play in this process. All studies were performed on tubules harvested from adrenalectomized rabbits, which were maintained on 0.15 M NaCl drinking water and dexamethasone 50 μg/d. Perfusion and bath solutions were symmetrical Ringer's bicarbonate with [K] of 5 meq/liter. Initial studies on cortical collecting tubules from adrenalectomized animals ingesting a high potassium chow (9 meq K/kg body wt) demonstrated net potassium secretion against an electrochemical gradient (mean collected fluid [K] 16.5±2.6 meq/liter with an observed transepithelial voltage of −6.3±4.1 mV; predicted voltage for passive distribution of potassium being −28.2 mV). To examine whether this active potassium secretion could be modulated by dietary potassium, independent of mineralocorticoid, two diets identical in all respects except for potassium content were formulated. Potassium secretion was compared in cortical collecting tubules harvested from adrenalectomized animals on low (0.1 meq K) and high (10 meq K) potassium intake.
Charles S. Wingo, Donald W. Seldin, Juha P. Kokko, Harry R. Jacobson
Usage data is cumulative from April 2023 through April 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 95 | 0 |
83 | 14 | |
Scanned page | 98 | 0 |
Citation downloads | 10 | 0 |
Totals | 286 | 14 |
Total Views | 300 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.