Direct diagnostic tests for Lyme disease

SE Schutzer, BA Body, J Boyle… - Clinical Infectious …, 2019 - academic.oup.com
SE Schutzer, BA Body, J Boyle, BM Branson, RJ Dattwyler, E Fikrig, NJ Gerald…
Clinical Infectious Diseases, 2019academic.oup.com
Borrelia burgdorferi was discovered to be the cause of Lyme disease in 1983, leading to
seroassays. The 1994 serodiagnostic testing guidelines predated a full understanding of key
B. burgdorferi antigens and have a number of shortcomings. These serologic tests cannot
distinguish active infection, past infection, or reinfection. Reliable direct-detection methods
for active B. burgdorferi infection have been lacking in the past but are needed and appear
achievable. New approaches have effectively been applied to other emerging infections and …
Abstract
Borrelia burgdorferi was discovered to be the cause of Lyme disease in 1983, leading to seroassays. The 1994 serodiagnostic testing guidelines predated a full understanding of key B. burgdorferi antigens and have a number of shortcomings. These serologic tests cannot distinguish active infection, past infection, or reinfection. Reliable direct-detection methods for active B. burgdorferi infection have been lacking in the past but are needed and appear achievable. New approaches have effectively been applied to other emerging infections and show promise in direct detection of B. burgdorferi infections.
Oxford University Press