Olfactory outcomes after endoscopic skull base surgery: a systematic review and meta‐analysis

LX Yin, CM Low, CL Puccinelli, EK O'Brien… - The …, 2019 - Wiley Online Library
LX Yin, CM Low, CL Puccinelli, EK O'Brien, JK Stokken, KM Van Abel, JR Janus, MJ Link…
The Laryngoscope, 2019Wiley Online Library
Objectives Determine the effect of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) on long‐term
olfactory outcomes after surgery. Methods An English‐language search was conducted
using the Cochrane, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases from January 2000 to
October 2017 for adult patients undergoing ESBS with subjective and objective olfaction
outcomes. Two authors independently examined articles to identify those meeting inclusion
criteria. Studies examining objective olfactory outcomes after ESBS were included in the …
Objectives
Determine the effect of endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) on long‐term olfactory outcomes after surgery.
Methods
An English‐language search was conducted using the Cochrane, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Embase databases from January 2000 to October 2017 for adult patients undergoing ESBS with subjective and objective olfaction outcomes. Two authors independently examined articles to identify those meeting inclusion criteria. Studies examining objective olfactory outcomes after ESBS were included in the meta‐analysis. A random‐effects meta‐analysis of patients undergoing sellar and parasellar ESBS was conducted to compare preoperative and postoperative olfactory outcomes using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) and Cross‐Cultural Smell Identification Test (CCSIT).
Results
Among 339 eligible articles, 29 articles met inclusion criteria. Twenty‐five of these focused on sellar and parasellar tumors. Individual articles not meeting criteria for meta‐analysis were qualitatively reported. Meta‐analysis showed there was no difference in preoperative and postoperative olfactory function after sellar and parasellar ESBS based on the UPSIT (five studies, mean difference [MD] = −1.03; 95% CI: −3.98, 1.93; P = .50) and the CCIST (three studies, MD = −0.77; 95% CI: −3.03, 1.49; P = .50). A pooled overall meta‐analysis revealed similar results (eight studies, effect size = −0.30; 95% CI: −0.79, 0.18; P = .22). However, heterogeneity for all meta‐analyses was high (I2 > 95%, P < .01), suggesting significant variation in the included studies.
Conclusions
Based on published objective olfaction outcomes after sellar and parasellar ESBS, there was no significant difference between preoperative and postoperative olfaction. Further prospective studies using validated objective measures of olfaction are required to improve our understanding on this subject.
Level of Evidence
2a
Laryngoscope, 129:1998–2007, 2019
Wiley Online Library