Systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: ASCO guideline

JD Gordan, EB Kennedy, GK Abou-Alfa… - Journal of Clinical …, 2020 - ascopubs.org
JD Gordan, EB Kennedy, GK Abou-Alfa, MS Beg, ST Brower, TP Gade, L Goff, S Gupta…
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2020ascopubs.org
PURPOSE To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist in clinical
decision making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS
ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of published phase III
randomized controlled trials (2007-2020) on systemic therapy for advanced HCC and
provide recommended care options for this patient population. RESULTS Nine phase III
randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria. RECOMMENDATIONS …
PURPOSE
To develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline to assist in clinical decision making for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS
ASCO convened an Expert Panel to conduct a systematic review of published phase III randomized controlled trials (2007-2020) on systemic therapy for advanced HCC and provide recommended care options for this patient population.
RESULTS
Nine phase III randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Atezolizumab + bevacizumab (atezo + bev) may be offered as first-line treatment of most patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) 0-1, and following management of esophageal varices, when present, according to institutional guidelines. Where there are contraindications to atezolizumab and/or bevacizumab, tyrosine kinase inhibitors sorafenib or lenvatinib may be offered as first-line treatment of patients with advanced HCC, Child-Pugh class A liver disease, and ECOG PS 0-1. Following first-line treatment with atezo + bev, and until better data are available, second-line therapy with a tyrosine kinase inhibitor may be recommended for appropriate candidates. Following first-line therapy with sorafenib or lenvatinib, second-line therapy options for appropriate candidates include cabozantinib, regorafenib for patients who previously tolerated sorafenib, or ramucirumab (for patients with α-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL), or atezo + bev where patients did not have access to this option as first-line therapy. Pembrolizumab or nivolumab are also reasonable options for appropriate patients following sorafenib or lenvatinib. Consideration of nivolumab + ipilimumab as an option for second-line therapy and third-line therapy is discussed. Further guidance on choosing between therapy options is included within the guideline. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/gastrointestinal-cancer-guidelines.
ASCO Publications