Somatic mosaicism in Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome suggests in vivo reversion by a DNA slippage mechanism

T Wada, SH Schurman, M Otsu… - Proceedings of the …, 2001 - National Acad Sciences
T Wada, SH Schurman, M Otsu, EK Garabedian, HD Ochs, DL Nelson, F Candotti
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2001National Acad Sciences
Somatic mosaicism caused by in vivo reversion of inherited mutations has been described in
several human genetic disorders. Back mutations resulting in restoration of wild-type
sequences and second-site mutations leading to compensatory changes have been shown
in mosaic individuals. In most cases, however, the precise genetic mechanisms underlying
the reversion events have remained unclear, except for the few instances where crossing
over or gene conversion have been demonstrated. Here, we report a patient affected with …
Somatic mosaicism caused by in vivo reversion of inherited mutations has been described in several human genetic disorders. Back mutations resulting in restoration of wild-type sequences and second-site mutations leading to compensatory changes have been shown in mosaic individuals. In most cases, however, the precise genetic mechanisms underlying the reversion events have remained unclear, except for the few instances where crossing over or gene conversion have been demonstrated. Here, we report a patient affected with Wiskott–Aldrich syndrome (WAS) caused by a 6-bp insertion (ACGAGG) in the WAS protein gene, which abrogates protein expression. Somatic mosaicism was documented in this patient whose majority of T lymphocytes expressed nearly normal levels of WAS protein. These lymphocytes were found to lack the deleterious mutation and showed a selective growth advantage in vivo. Analysis of the sequence surrounding the mutation site showed that the 6-bp insertion followed a tandem repeat of the same six nucleotides. These findings strongly suggest that DNA polymerase slippage was the cause of the original germ-line insertion mutation in this family and that the same mechanism was responsible for its deletion in one of the propositus T cell progenitors, thus leading to reversion mosaicism.
National Acad Sciences