[HTML][HTML] A new non-linear normalization method for reducing variability in DNA microarray experiments

C Workman, LJ Jensen, H Jarmer, R Berka, L Gautier… - Genome biology, 2002 - Springer
C Workman, LJ Jensen, H Jarmer, R Berka, L Gautier, HB Nielser, HH Saxild, C Nielsen…
Genome biology, 2002Springer
Background Microarray data are subject to multiple sources of variation, of which biological
sources are of interest whereas most others are only confounding. Recent work has
identified systematic sources of variation that are intensity-dependent and non-linear in
nature. Systematic sources of variation are not limited to the differing properties of the
cyanine dyes Cy5 and Cy3 as observed in cDNA arrays, but are the general case for both
oligonucleotide microarray (Affymetrix GeneChips) and cDNA microarray data. Current …
Background
Microarray data are subject to multiple sources of variation, of which biological sources are of interest whereas most others are only confounding. Recent work has identified systematic sources of variation that are intensity-dependent and non-linear in nature. Systematic sources of variation are not limited to the differing properties of the cyanine dyes Cy5 and Cy3 as observed in cDNA arrays, but are the general case for both oligonucleotide microarray (Affymetrix GeneChips) and cDNA microarray data. Current normalization techniques are most often linear and therefore not capable of fully correcting for these effects.
Results
We present here a simple and robust non-linear method for normalization using array signal distribution analysis and cubic splines. These methods compared favorably to normalization using robust local-linear regression (lowess). The application of these methods to oligonucleotide arrays reduced the relative error between replicates by 5-10% compared with a standard global normalization method. Application to cDNA arrays showed improvements over the standard method and over Cy3-Cy5 normalization based on dye-swap replication. In addition, a set of known differentially regulated genes was ranked higher by the t-test. In either cDNA or Affymetrix technology, signal-dependent bias was more than ten times greater than the observed print-tip or spatial effects.
Conclusions
Intensity-dependent normalization is important for both high-density oligonucleotide array and cDNA array data. Both the regression and spline-based methods described here performed better than existing linear methods when assessed on the variability of replicate arrays. Dye-swap normalization was less effective at Cy3-Cy5 normalization than either regression or spline-based methods alone.
Springer