Predictive role of the overexpression for CXCR4, C-Met, and VEGF-C among breast cancer patients: a meta-analysis

F Wang, S Li, Y Zhao, K Yang, M Chen, H Niu, J Yang… - The Breast, 2016 - Elsevier
F Wang, S Li, Y Zhao, K Yang, M Chen, H Niu, J Yang, Y Luo, W Tang, M Sheng
The Breast, 2016Elsevier
Background The overexpression of CXCR4, C-Met and VEGF-C present widely in breast
tumors, they may be markers of resistance to treatment. However, the studies are still
controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis aims to research the relationship between the
overexpression of CXCR4, C-Met, VEGF-C and clinical prognosis among breast cancer
patients. Methods PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for eligible literature.
The outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) …
Background
The overexpression of CXCR4, C-Met and VEGF-C present widely in breast tumors, they may be markers of resistance to treatment. However, the studies are still controversial. Thus, this meta-analysis aims to research the relationship between the overexpression of CXCR4, C-Met, VEGF-C and clinical prognosis among breast cancer patients.
Methods
PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched for eligible literature. The outcomes of interest were progression-free survival (PFS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). All tests of statistical significance were two sided.
Results
A total of 7830 patients from 28 eligible studies were assessed. The overexpression of the CXCR4 and C-Met both implied significantly worse PFS compared with normal expression [HR = 2.56, 95% CI = 1.34–4.91, P = 0.005; and HR = 1.63 95% CI = 1.20–2.22, P = 0.002]. Meanwhile, if patients had high expression of CXCR4, they would have worse OS [HR = 2.56 95% CI = 1.52–4.31, P = 0.000]. However, the overexpression of C-Met did not relate to OS for breast cancer patients [HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.69–1.95, P = 0.570]. Meanwhile, no statistically significant different was observed with respect to PFS and OS between VEGF-C overexpression and normal expression [HR = 0.99, 95% CI = 0.64–1.52, P = 0.968; and HR = 0.76, 95% CI = 0.43–1.33, P = 0.333].
Conclusions
Our meta-analysis showed that CXCR4 and C-Met were efficient prognostic factors for breast cancer. Nevertheless, highly expressing VEGF-C was not related to progression-free survival and overall survival. Due to the small samples and insufficient date, further studies should be conducted to clarify the association between the overexpression of CXCR4 or C-Met or VEGF-C and the prognosis about breast cancer patients.
Elsevier