Still human: a call for increased focus on ethical standards in cadaver research

MC Bach - HEC forum, 2016 - Springer
MC Bach
HEC forum, 2016Springer
Research on human cadavers is an important mechanism of scientific progress and
comprises a large industry in the United States. However, despite its importance and
influence, there is little ethical or regulatory oversight of cadaver-based research. This lack
of transparency raises important ethical questions. Thus, this paper serves as a call for
ethicists and regulators to pay increased attention to cadaver research. I argue that cadaver
research ought to be considered a subset of human subjects research and held accountable …
Abstract
Research on human cadavers is an important mechanism of scientific progress and comprises a large industry in the United States. However, despite its importance and influence, there is little ethical or regulatory oversight of cadaver-based research. This lack of transparency raises important ethical questions. Thus, this paper serves as a call for ethicists and regulators to pay increased attention to cadaver research. I argue that cadaver research ought to be considered a subset of human subjects research and held accountable to higher ethical standards. After describing current practices, I argue that oversight of cadaver research as a form of human subjects research is appropriate because cadaver research is similar to other types of human research, participants in cadaver research incur risks of harm, and a current lack of oversight has allowed the cadaver industry to entice research participation through ethically questionable practices. This paper urges greater dialogue among human subjects research ethicists and regulators about what constitutes appropriate protections for participants in cadaver research.
Springer