[HTML][HTML] Skin rash could predict the response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor and the prognosis for patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and …

H Liu, Y Wu, T Lv, Y Yao, Y Xiao, D Yuan, Y Song - PLoS one, 2013 - journals.plos.org
H Liu, Y Wu, T Lv, Y Yao, Y Xiao, D Yuan, Y Song
PLoS one, 2013journals.plos.org
Background The aim of this study was to assess the role of skin rash in predicting the
efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and the
prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Method We systematically
searched for eligible articles investigating the association between rash and the efficacy of
EGFR-TKIs and the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. The summary risk ratio (RR) and
hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using meta-analysis. Results We identified 33 eligible …
Background
The aim of this study was to assess the role of skin rash in predicting the efficacy of epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) and the prognosis of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Method
We systematically searched for eligible articles investigating the association between rash and the efficacy of EGFR-TKIs and the prognosis of patients with NSCLC. The summary risk ratio (RR) and hazard ratio (HR) were calculated using meta-analysis.
Results
We identified 33 eligible trials involving 6,798 patients. We used two different standards to group the patients [standard 1: rash vs. no rash, standard 2: rash (≥ stage 2) vs. rash (stage 0, 1)]. For standard 1, the objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of the rash group were significantly higher than the no rash group [RR = 3.28; 95% CI: 2.41–4.47(corrected RR = 2.225, 95% CI: 1.658–2.986); RR = 1.96, 95% CI: 1.58–2.43]. The same results were observed for standard 2. For standards 1 and 2, the progression-free survival (PFS) (HR = 0.45, 95% CI: 0.37–0.53; HR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.50–0.65) and overall survival (OS) (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.28–0.52; HR = 0.53, 95% CI: 0.35–0.71) of the rash group were significantly longer than the control group, and the same results were observed in the subgroup analysis.
Conclusions
skin rash after EGFR-TKI treatment may be an efficient clinical marker for predicting the response of patients with NSCLC to EGFR-TKIs. Furthermore, skin rash is also the prognostic factor of patients with NSCLC. Patients with skin rash have a longer PFS and OS.
PLOS