[HTML][HTML] Randomised phase 2 study of pembrolizumab plus CC-486 versus pembrolizumab plus placebo in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell …

BP Levy, G Giaccone, B Besse, E Felip… - European journal of …, 2019 - Elsevier
BP Levy, G Giaccone, B Besse, E Felip, MC Garassino, MD Gomez, P Garrido, B Piperdi…
European journal of cancer, 2019Elsevier
Introduction Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that combining epigenetic agents
with checkpoint inhibitors can potentially improve outcomes in patients with previously
treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 2 trial examined second-
line pembrolizumab+ CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods
Patients with one prior line of platinum-containing therapy were randomised in a ratio of 1: 1
to CC-486 or placebo, on days 1–14, in combination with pembrolizumab on day 1 of a 21 …
Introduction
Preclinical and early clinical studies suggest that combining epigenetic agents with checkpoint inhibitors can potentially improve outcomes in patients with previously treated advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This phase 2 trial examined second-line pembrolizumab + CC-486 (oral azacitidine) in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Methods
Patients with one prior line of platinum-containing therapy were randomised in a ratio of 1:1 to CC-486 or placebo, on days 1–14, in combination with pembrolizumab on day 1 of a 21-day cycle. The primary end-point was progression-free survival (PFS). Key secondary end-points included overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and safety.
Results
Among 100 patients randomised (pembrolizumab + CC-486: 51; pembrolizumab + placebo: 49), most were male (57.0%), were white (87.0%) and had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 1 (68.0%). No significant difference in PFS was observed between the pembrolizumab + CC-486 and pembrolizumab + placebo arms (median, 2.9 and 4.0 months, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 1.374; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.926–2.038; P = 0.1789). Median OS was 11.9 months versus not estimable (HR, 1.375; 90% CI, 0.830–2.276; P = 0.2968); ORR was 20% versus 14%. Median treatment duration was shorter (15.0 versus 24.1 weeks), and the number of cycles was lower (5.0 versus 7.0) with pembrolizumab + CC-486 versus pembrolizumab + placebo. No new safety signals for CC-486 or pembrolizumab were detected. Treatment-emergent adverse events were more common in the pembrolizumab + CC-486 arm, particularly gastrointestinal, potentially impacting treatment feasibility.
Conclusions
No improvement in PFS was observed with pembrolizumab + CC-486 versus pembrolizumab + placebo. Decreased treatment exposure due to adverse events may have impacted efficacy with pembrolizumab + CC-486.
Elsevier