Enhancing venous outflow in the lower limb with intermittent pneumatic compression. A comparative haemodynamic analysis on the effect of foot vs. calf vs. foot and …

KT Delis, G Slimani, HM Hafez… - European Journal of …, 2000 - Elsevier
KT Delis, G Slimani, HM Hafez, AN Nicolaides
European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 2000Elsevier
Objectives: intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), an established method of deep-vein
thrombosis prophylaxis, is also an effective means of leg inflow enhancement, improving the
walking capacity and ankle pressure of claudicants, long-term. This study, using duplex
ultrasonography, compares the haemodynamic effect of IPC of the (a) foot (at 120 mmHg
[IPCfoot/120 mmHg], and 180 mmHg [IPCfoot/180 mmHg]),(b) calf (IPCcalf, 120 mmHg) and
(c) both simultaneously (IPCfoot+ calf, 120 mmHg), on the venous outflow of 20 legs of …
Objectives
intermittent pneumatic compression (IPC), an established method of deep-vein thrombosis prophylaxis, is also an effective means of leg inflow enhancement, improving the walking capacity and ankle pressure of claudicants, long-term. This study, using duplex ultrasonography, compares the haemodynamic effect of IPC of the (a) foot (at 120 mmHg [IPCfoot/120 mmHg], and 180 mmHg [IPCfoot/180 mmHg]), (b) calf (IPCcalf, 120 mmHg) and (c) both simultaneously (IPCfoot+calf, 120 mmHg), on the venous outflow of 20 legs of normals and 25 legs of claudicants.
Results
the peak and mean velocities, volume flow and pulsatility index in the superficial femoral and popliteal veins of both groups increased significantly with all IPC modes (p<0.001). IPCfoot+calfproduced the highest enhancement followed by IPCcalf(p<0.01), which was more effective (p<0.001) than either IPCfoot/180 mmHgor IPCfoot/120 mmHg. The venous volume expelled with IPCcalfand IPCfoot+calfwas 2–2.5 and 3–3.5 times that with IPCfoot/180 mmHgrespectively. Velocity enhancement with IPC was similar between groups and the superficial femoral and popliteal veins. IPCfoot/180 mmHgproduced higher (p<0.01) flow velocities than IPCfoot/120 mmHgin both groups and veins examined; however, differences were limited.
Conclusions
all IPC modes proved effective, IPCfoot+calfgenerating the highest venous outflow enhancement. Higher venous volumes expelled with IPCfoot+calfexplain its reported superiority on leg inflow over the other modes. Increase of applied pressure from 120 to 180 mmHg with IPCfootoffered only a small outflow improvement. Venous haemodynamics at rest and with IPC in claudicants do not differ significantly from those in healthy subjects.
Elsevier