Unexpected hepatotoxicity of rifampin and saquinavir/ritonavir in healthy male volunteers

C Schmitt, M Riek, K Winters, M Schutz… - Archives of drug …, 2009 - Wiley Online Library
C Schmitt, M Riek, K Winters, M Schutz, S Grange
Archives of drug information, 2009Wiley Online Library
Objectives. Rifampin is a potent inducer of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme (CYP3A4)
that metabolizes most protease inhibitor (PI) antiretrovirals. This study was designed to
evaluate the steady‐state pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the coadministration of the PIs
saquinavir and ritonavir (a CYP3A4 inhibitor used as a pharmacoenhancer of other PIs) and
rifampin when coadministered in healthy HIV‐negative volunteers. Methods. In an open‐
label, randomized, one sequence, two‐period crossover study involving 28 healthy HIV …
Abstract
Objectives.  Rifampin is a potent inducer of the cytochrome P450 3A4 isoenzyme (CYP3A4) that metabolizes most protease inhibitor (PI) antiretrovirals. This study was designed to evaluate the steady‐state pharmacokinetics and tolerability of the coadministration of the PIs saquinavir and ritonavir (a CYP3A4 inhibitor used as a pharmacoenhancer of other PIs) and rifampin when coadministered in healthy HIV‐negative volunteers.
Methods.  In an open‐label, randomized, one sequence, two‐period crossover study involving 28 healthy HIV‐negative volunteers, arm 1 was randomized to receive saquinavir/ritonavir 1000/100 mg twice daily while arm 2 received rifampin 600 mg once daily for 14 days. Both arms were then to receive concomitant saquinavir/ritonavir and rifampin for 2 additional weeks. Vital signs, electrocardiography, laboratory analyses, and blood levels of total saquinavir, ritonavir, rifampin, and desacetyl‐rifampin, the primary metabolite of rifampin, were measured.
Results.  In arm 1, 10/14 (71%) and, in arm 2, 11/14 (79%) participants completed the first study phase; eight participants in arm 1 and nine in arm 2 went on to receive both saquinavir/ritonavir and rifampin. Following substantial elevations (≥ grade 2) in hepatic transaminases in participants receiving the coadministered agents, the study was discontinued prematurely. Two participants in arm 1 displayed moderate elevations after five and four doses of rifampin, respectively. In arm 2, all participants experienced severe elevations within 4 days of initiating saquinavir/ritonavir. Clinical symptoms (e.g., nausea, vomiting, abdominal pain, and headache) were more common and severe in arm 2. Clinical symptoms abated and transaminases normalized following drug discontinuation. Limited pharmacokinetic data suggest a possible relationship between transaminase elevation and elevated rifampin and desacetyl‐rifampin concentrations.
Conclusions.  Although not confirmed in HIV‐infected patients, the data indicate that rifampin should not be coadministered with saquinavir/ritonavir.
Wiley Online Library