A randomized phase II study of nivolumab or nivolumab combined with ipilimumab in patients (pts) with melanoma brain metastases (mets): The Anti-PD1 Brain …

GV Long, V Atkinson, AM Menzies, S Lo, AD Guminski… - 2017 - ascopubs.org
GV Long, V Atkinson, AM Menzies, S Lo, AD Guminski, MP Brown, MM Gonzalez…
2017ascopubs.org
9508 Background: Nivolumab (nivo) and the combination of nivo+ ipilimumab (ipi) improve
response rates (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with ipi alone in clinical
trials of metastatic melanoma pts, but pts with untreated brain mets were excluded. Brain
mets are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in melanoma and their management is
critical. We sought to determine the antitumour activity and safety of nivo and nivo+ ipi in pts
with active melanoma brain mets (NCT02374242). Methods: This open-label, ph II trial …
9508
Background: Nivolumab (nivo) and the combination of nivo + ipilimumab (ipi) improve response rates (RR) and progression-free survival (PFS) compared with ipi alone in clinical trials of metastatic melanoma pts, but pts with untreated brain mets were excluded. Brain mets are a major cause of morbidity and mortality in melanoma and their management is critical. We sought to determine the antitumour activity and safety of nivo and nivo+ipi in pts with active melanoma brain mets (NCT02374242). Methods: This open-label, ph II trial enrolled 3 cohorts of pts naïve to anti-PD1/PDL1/PDL2/CTLA4 from Nov 2014 - Feb 2017. Pts with asymptomatic melanoma brain mets with no prior local brain therapy were randomised to cohort A (nivo 1mg/kg + ipi 3mg/kg, Q3W x4, then nivo 3mg/kg Q2W) or cohort B (nivo 3mg/kg Q2W). Cohort C (nivo 3mg/kg Q2W) had brain mets 1) that failed local therapy (new +/- progressed in previously treated met), 2) were neurologically symptomatic and/or 3) with leptomeningeal disease. Prior BRAF inhibitor (BRAFi) was allowed. The primary endpoint was best intracranial response (ICR) ≥ wk12. Secondary endpoints were best extracranial response (ECR), best overall response (OR), IC PFS, EC PFS, overall PFS, OS, and safety. Results: A total of 66 pts (med f/u 14 mo) were included in this analysis of total 76 planned; median age 60y, 77% male. For cohorts A, B and C: elevated LDH 48%, 58% and 19%; V600BRAF 44%, 56% and 81%; prior BRAFi 24%, 24%, 75%. Table shows RR, PFS and OS. ICR in cohort A treatment naïve vs prior BRAFi was 53% vs 16%. Treatment-related gd 3/4 toxicity in cohorts A, B and C were 68%, 40% and 56%, respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions:Nivo monotherapy and ipi+nivo and are active in melanoma brain mets. Ipi+nivo had reduced activity in pts who progressed on BRAFi. Pts with symptomatic brain mets, leptomeningeal mets or previous local therapy responded poorly to nivo alone. Clinical trial information: NCT02374242.A
N = 25
nivo+ipiB
N = 25
nivoC
N = 16
nivoICR % (95% CI)44 (24, 65)20 (7, 41)6 (0, 30)ICR Complete Response16 (24, 65)12 (7, 41)0ECR % (95% CI)38 (18, 62)26 (10, 48)21 (5, 50)6-mo PFS % (95% CI)50 (33, 75)29 (15, 56)06-mo OS % (95% CI)76 (59, 97)59 (41, 86)44 (25, 76)
ASCO Publications