Prognostic impact, concurrent genetic mutations, and gene expression features of AML with CEBPA mutations in a cohort of 1182 cytogenetically normal AML patients: further …

E Taskesen, L Bullinger, A Corbacioglu… - Blood, The Journal …, 2011 - ashpublications.org
E Taskesen, L Bullinger, A Corbacioglu, MA Sanders, CAJ Erpelinck, BJ Wouters…
Blood, The Journal of the American Society of Hematology, 2011ashpublications.org
We evaluated concurrent gene mutations, clinical outcome, and gene expression signatures
of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA) double mutations (CEBPA dm) versus
single mutations (CEBPA sm) in 1182 cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (AML)
patients (16-60 years of age). We identified 151 (12.8%) patients with CEBPA mutations (91
CEBPA dm and 60 CEBPA sm). The incidence of germline mutations was 7%(5 of 71),
including 3 C-terminal mutations. CEBPA dm patients had a lower frequency of concurrent …
Abstract
We evaluated concurrent gene mutations, clinical outcome, and gene expression signatures of CCAAT/enhancer binding protein alpha (CEBPA) double mutations (CEBPAdm) versus single mutations (CEBPAsm) in 1182 cytogenetically normal acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients (16-60 years of age). We identified 151 (12.8%) patients with CEBPA mutations (91 CEBPAdm and 60 CEBPAsm). The incidence of germline mutations was 7% (5 of 71), including 3 C-terminal mutations. CEBPAdm patients had a lower frequency of concurrent mutations than CEBPAsm patients (P < .0001). Both, groups were associated with a favorable outcome compared with CEBPAwt (5-year overall survival [OS] 63% and 56% vs 39%; P < .0001 and P = .05, respectively). However, in multivariable analysis only CEBPAdm was a prognostic factor for favorable OS outcome (hazard ratio [HR] 0.36, P < .0001; event-free survival, HR 0.41, P < .0001; relapse-free survival, HR 0.55, P = .001). Outcome in CEBPAsm is dominated by concurrent NPM1 and/or FLT3 internal tandem duplication mutations. Unsupervised and supervised GEP analyses showed that CEBPAdm AML (n = 42), but not CEBPAsm AML (n = 18), expressed a unique gene signature. A 25-probe set prediction signature for CEBPAdm AML showed 100% sensitivity and specificity. Based on these findings, we propose that CEBPAdm should be clearly defined from CEBPAsm AML and considered as a separate entity in the classification of AML.
ashpublications.org