Immunosuppression and the risk of post‐transplant malignancy among cadaveric first kidney transplant recipients

RT Bustami, AO Ojo, RA Wolfe… - American Journal of …, 2004 - Wiley Online Library
RT Bustami, AO Ojo, RA Wolfe, RM Merion, WM Bennett, SV McDiarmid, AB Leichtman…
American Journal of Transplantation, 2004Wiley Online Library
The success of renal transplantation may be counterbalanced by serious adverse medical
events. The effect of immunosuppression on the incidence of de novo neoplasms among
kidney recipients should be monitored continuously. Using data from the Scientific Registry
of Transplant Recipients, we studied the association of induction therapy by
immunosuppression with antilymphocyte antibodies, with the development of de novo
neoplasms. The study population included more than 41 000 recipients who received a …
The success of renal transplantation may be counterbalanced by serious adverse medical events. The effect of immunosuppression on the incidence of de novo neoplasms among kidney recipients should be monitored continuously. Using data from the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients, we studied the association of induction therapy by immunosuppression with antilymphocyte antibodies, with the development of de novo neoplasms. The study population included more than 41 000 recipients who received a cadaveric first kidney transplant after December 31, 1995, and were followed through February 28, 2002.
Using Cox regression models, we estimated time to development of two types of malignancy: de novo solid tumors and post‐transplant lymphoproliferative disorder (PTLD). We made adjustments for several patient demographic factors and comorbidities.
Induction therapy was significantly associated with a higher relative risk (RR) of PTLD (RR = 1.78, p < 0.001), but not with a greater likelihood of de novo tumors (RR = 1.07, p = 0.42). Treatment with maintenance tacrolimus vs. cyclosporine showed a significantly different RR of developing de novo tumors for recipients with induction than for those not receiving induction (p = 0.024). These new estimates of the magnitude of malignancy risk associated with induction therapy may be useful for clinical practice.
Wiley Online Library