[HTML][HTML] Retroviral DNA integration: ASLV, HIV, and MLV show distinct target site preferences

RS Mitchell, BF Beitzel, ARW Schroder, P Shinn… - PLoS …, 2004 - journals.plos.org
RS Mitchell, BF Beitzel, ARW Schroder, P Shinn, H Chen, CC Berry, JR Ecker, FD Bushman
PLoS biology, 2004journals.plos.org
The completion of the human genome sequence has made possible genome-wide studies
of retroviral DNA integration. Here we report an analysis of 3,127 integration site sequences
from human cells. We compared retroviral vectors derived from human immunodeficiency
virus (HIV), avian sarcoma-leukosis virus (ASLV), and murine leukemia virus (MLV). Effects
of gene activity on integration targeting were assessed by transcriptional profiling of infected
cells. Integration by HIV vectors, analyzed in two primary cell types and several cell lines …
The completion of the human genome sequence has made possible genome-wide studies of retroviral DNA integration. Here we report an analysis of 3,127 integration site sequences from human cells. We compared retroviral vectors derived from human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), avian sarcoma-leukosis virus (ASLV), and murine leukemia virus (MLV). Effects of gene activity on integration targeting were assessed by transcriptional profiling of infected cells. Integration by HIV vectors, analyzed in two primary cell types and several cell lines, strongly favored active genes. An analysis of the effects of tissue-specific transcription showed that it resulted in tissue-specific integration targeting by HIV, though the effect was quantitatively modest. Chromosomal regions rich in expressed genes were favored for HIV integration, but these regions were found to be interleaved with unfavorable regions at CpG islands. MLV vectors showed a strong bias in favor of integration near transcription start sites, as reported previously. ASLV vectors showed only a weak preference for active genes and no preference for transcription start regions. Thus, each of the three retroviruses studied showed unique integration site preferences, suggesting that virus-specific binding of integration complexes to chromatin features likely guides site selection.
PLOS