Proof-of-principle evaluation of the efficacy of fewer than three doses of a bivalent HPV16/18 vaccine

AR Kreimer, AC Rodriguez… - Journal of the …, 2011 - academic.oup.com
AR Kreimer, AC Rodriguez, A Hildesheim, R Herrero, C Porras, M Schiffman, P González
Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 2011academic.oup.com
Background Three-dose regimens for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are expensive
and difficult to complete, especially in settings where the need for cervical cancer prevention
is greatest. Methods We evaluated the vaccine efficacy of fewer than three doses of the
HPV16/18 vaccine Cervarix in our Costa Rica Vaccine Trial. Women were randomly
assigned to receive three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine or to a control vaccine and were
followed for incident HPV16 or HPV18 infection that persisted in visits that were 10 or more …
Background
Three-dose regimens for human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines are expensive and difficult to complete, especially in settings where the need for cervical cancer prevention is greatest.
Methods
We evaluated the vaccine efficacy of fewer than three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine Cervarix in our Costa Rica Vaccine Trial. Women were randomly assigned to receive three doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine or to a control vaccine and were followed for incident HPV16 or HPV18 infection that persisted in visits that were 10 or more months apart (median follow-up 4.2 years). After excluding women who had no follow-up or who were HPV16 and HPV18 DNA positive at enrollment, 5967 women received three vaccine doses (2957 HPV vaccine vs 3010 control vaccine), 802 received two doses (422 HPV vs 380 control), and 384 received one dose (196 HPV vs 188 control). Reasons for receiving fewer doses and other pre- and post-randomization characteristics were balanced within each dosage group between women receiving the HPV and control vaccines.
Results
Incident HPV16 or HPV18 infections that persisted for 1 year were unrelated to dosage of the control vaccine. Vaccine efficacy was 80.9% for three doses of the HPV vaccine (95% confidence interval [CI] = 71.1% to 87.7%; 25 and 133 events in the HPV and control arms, respectively), 84.1% for two doses (95% CI = 50.2% to 96.3%; 3 and 17 events), and 100% for one dose (95% CI = 66.5% to 100%; 0 and 10 events).
Conclusion
Four years after vaccination of women who appeared to be uninfected, this nonrandomized analysis suggests that two doses of the HPV16/18 vaccine, and maybe even one dose, are as protective as three doses.
Oxford University Press