In 1906, Alois Alzheimer described the neuropathology of the disease that was to bear his name. 1 Subsequently, our understanding of Alzheimer disease (AD) has grown significantly. The autosomal dominant mutations to the amyloid precursor protein (APP), presenilin (PS) 1, and PS2 genes that cause early onset AD have been very informative, leading to the articulation of the amyloid cascade hypothesis. 2–4 This hypothesis has been the basis for several disease-modifying therapeutic approaches for AD. This has been partly because it provided a coherent framework for understanding AD pathogenesis but also because several pharmacological approaches that targeted the amyloid peptide (amyloidocentric) were sufficiently well-founded scientifically to enter clinical development. In the past 5 years, there have been 6 amyloidocentric programs that completed phase 3 clinical testing. None met their primary outcome measures (Table 1), although 1, solanezumab, showed encouraging results in a prespecified secondary outcome measure. This disappointing track record has brought into question the amyloidocentric therapeutic approach. This review will consider these programs from the following perspectives: