Sifalimumab, a human anti–interferon‐α monoclonal antibody, in systemic lupus erythematosus: a phase I randomized, controlled, dose‐escalation study

M Petri, DJ Wallace, A Spindler… - Arthritis & …, 2013 - Wiley Online Library
M Petri, DJ Wallace, A Spindler, V Chindalore, K Kalunian, E Mysler, CM Neuwelt, G Robbie…
Arthritis & Rheumatism, 2013Wiley Online Library
Objective To evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple intravenous (IV) doses of
sifalimumab in adults with moderate‐to‐severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods In this multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential dose‐escalation
study, patients were randomized 3: 1 to receive IV sifalimumab (0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10.0 mg/kg)
or placebo every 2 weeks to week 26, then followed up for 24 weeks. Safety assessment
included recording of treatment‐emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs …
Objective
To evaluate the safety and tolerability of multiple intravenous (IV) doses of sifalimumab in adults with moderate‐to‐severe systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
Methods
In this multicenter, double‐blind, placebo‐controlled, sequential dose‐escalation study, patients were randomized 3:1 to receive IV sifalimumab (0.3, 1.0, 3.0, or 10.0 mg/kg) or placebo every 2 weeks to week 26, then followed up for 24 weeks. Safety assessment included recording of treatment‐emergent adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs. Pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and pharmacodynamics were evaluated, and disease activity was assessed.
Results
Of 161 patients, 121 received sifalimumab (26 received 0.3 mg/kg; 25, 1.0 mg/kg; 27, 3.0 mg/kg; and 43, 10 mg/kg) and 40 received placebo. Patients were predominantly female (95.7%). At baseline, patients had moderate‐to‐severe disease activity (mean SLE Disease Activity Index score 11.0), and most (75.2%) had a high type I interferon (IFN) gene signature. In the sifalimumab group versus the placebo group, the incidence of ≥1 treatment‐emergent AE was 92.6% versus 95.0%, ≥1 serious AE was 22.3% versus 27.5%, and ≥1 infection was 67.8% versus 62.5%; discontinuations due to AEs occurred in 9.1% versus 7.5%, and death occurred in 3.3% (n = 4) versus 2.5% (n = 1). Serum sifalimumab concentrations increased in a linear and dose‐proportional manner. Inhibition of the type I IFN gene signature was sustained during treatment in patients with a high baseline signature. No statistically significant differences in clinical activity (SLEDAI and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group score) between sifalimumab and placebo were observed. However, when adjusted for excess burst steroids, SLEDAI change from baseline showed a positive trend over time. A trend toward normal complement C3 or C4 level at week 26 was seen in the sifalimumab groups compared with baseline.
Conclusion
The observed safety/tolerability and clinical activity profile of sifalimumab support its continued clinical development for SLE.
Wiley Online Library