Landscaping the cancer terrain

KW Kinzler, B Vogelstein - Science, 1998 - science.org
Science, 1998science.org
Few lines of investigation have taught us more about cancer than the study of inherited
tumor susceptibility syndromes. Initially, the mutations responsible for these diseases were
thought to promote malignancy in a straightforward manner, through inactivation of “tumor
suppressor” genes, which directly modulate cell birth or cell death. More recently, however,
susceptibility genes that work through less-direct mechanisms have come to light. The
genes defective in patients with juvenile polyposis syndromes (JPSs), for example—one of …
Few lines of investigation have taught us more about cancer than the study of inherited tumor susceptibility syndromes. Initially, the mutations responsible for these diseases were thought to promote malignancy in a straightforward manner, through inactivation of “tumor suppressor” genes, which directly modulate cell birth or cell death. More recently, however, susceptibility genes that work through less-direct mechanisms have come to light. The genes defective in patients with juvenile polyposis syndromes (JPSs), for example—one of which is described on page 1086 of this issue (1)—illuminate this principle and also raise fundamental questions about the relation between neoplastic cells and the “other cells” that together constitute a tumor mass.
A dozen tumor suppressor genes are known to prevent cancer through direct control of cell growth—including p53, Rb, VHL, and APC. Inactivation of these genes contributes directly to the neoplastic growth of the tumor; thus, they normally function as “gatekeepers” to prevent runaway growth (see the figure). Accordingly, restoration of the missing gatekeeper function to cancer cells leads to suppression of the neoplastic growth.
AAAS