Bystander central memory but not effector memory CD8+ T cells suppress allograft rejection

N Wan, H Dai, T Wang, Y Moore… - The Journal of …, 2008 - journals.aai.org
N Wan, H Dai, T Wang, Y Moore, XX Zheng, Z Dai
The Journal of Immunology, 2008journals.aai.org
Memory T cells respond faster and more vigorously than their naive counterparts and are
critical for adaptive immunity. However, it is unknown whether and how memory T cells react
in the face of irrelevant Ags. It is generally accepted that bystander memory T cells are
neutral in immune responsiveness. In this study, we present the first evidence that bystander
central memory (T CM), but not effector memory (T EM), CD8+ T cells suppress allograft
rejection as well as T cell proliferation in the draining lymph nodes (DLN) of recipient mice …
Abstract
Memory T cells respond faster and more vigorously than their naive counterparts and are critical for adaptive immunity. However, it is unknown whether and how memory T cells react in the face of irrelevant Ags. It is generally accepted that bystander memory T cells are neutral in immune responsiveness. In this study, we present the first evidence that bystander central memory (T CM), but not effector memory (T EM), CD8+ T cells suppress allograft rejection as well as T cell proliferation in the draining lymph nodes (DLN) of recipient mice. Both bystander T CM and naive T cells, but fewer T EM cells, migrated to DLN, whereas T CM cells exhibited faster turnover than their naive counterparts, suggesting that bystander T CM cells have an advantage over their naive counterparts in suppression. However, bystander T EM cells migrated to inflammatory graft sites, but not DLN, and yet failed to exert their suppression. These findings indicate that bystander memory T cells need to migrate to lymph nodes to exert their suppression by inhibiting responder T cell activation or homeostatic proliferation. Moreover, the suppression mediated by bystander T CM cells was largely dependent on IL-15, as IL-15 was required for their homeostatic proliferation and T CM-mediated suppression of allograft rejection. This suppression also required the presence of TGFβ1, as T CM cells expressed TGFβ1 while neutralizing TGFβ1 abolished their suppression. Thus, bystander T CM, but not T EM, CD8+ T cells are potent suppressors rather than bystanders. This new finding will have an impact on cellular immunology and may have clinic implications for tolerance induction.
journals.aai.org