Cardioprotection with dexrazoxane for doxorubicin-containing therapy in advanced breast cancer.

SM Swain, FS Whaley, MC Gerber… - Journal of Clinical …, 1997 - ascopubs.org
SM Swain, FS Whaley, MC Gerber, S Weisberg, M York, D Spicer, SE Jones, S Wadler…
Journal of Clinical Oncology, 1997ascopubs.org
PURPOSE To determine the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane (DZR) used in a
doxorubicin-based combination therapy in advanced breast cancer. PATIENTS AND
METHODS Between November 1988 and January 1991, 534 patients with advanced breast
cancer were randomized to two multicenter, double-blind studies (088001 and 088006).
Patients received fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) with either DZR
(DZR-to-doxorubicin ratio, 10: 1) or placebo (PLA) every 3 weeks and were monitored with …
PURPOSE
To determine the cardioprotective effect of dexrazoxane (DZR) used in a doxorubicin-based combination therapy in advanced breast cancer.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Between November 1988 and January 1991, 534 patients with advanced breast cancer were randomized to two multicenter, double-blind studies (088001 and 088006). Patients received fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FAC) with either DZR (DZR-to-doxorubicin ratio, 10:1) or placebo (PLA) every 3 weeks and were monitored with serial multiplegated acquisition (MUGA) scans.
RESULTS
The hazards ratio (HR) of PLA to DZR for a cardiac event, which was predefined ejection fraction changes or congestive heart failure (CHF), was 2.63 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.61 to 4.27; P < .001) for 088001 and 2.00 (95% CI, 1.01 to 3.96; P = .038) for 088006. The objective response rates for 088001 were 46.8% for DZR and 60.5% for PLA, a difference of 14% (95% CI, -25% to -2%; P = .019), and for 088006 were 53.7% for DZR and 49.3% for PLA, a difference of 4% (95% CI, -13% to 22%; P = .63). Time to progression and survival were not significantly different between treatment arms in either study. Toxicities on the DZR arms included lower granulocyte and platelet counts at nadir (P = .009 and P = .004, respectively) and more pain on injection (P = .001), with no difference in the rates of fever, infection, or hemorrhage.
CONCLUSION
DZR had a significant cardioprotective effect as measured by noninvasive testing and clinical CHF. One of the two studies (088001) showed a lower response rate with DZR, but time to progression and survival were not significantly different. DZR is the first agent shown to reduce cardiotoxicity from doxorubicin.
ASCO Publications