Tonic descending facilitation from the rostral ventromedial medulla mediates opioid-induced abnormal pain and antinociceptive tolerance

TW Vanderah, NMH Suenaga, MH Ossipov… - Journal of …, 2001 - Soc Neuroscience
TW Vanderah, NMH Suenaga, MH Ossipov, TP Malan, J Lai, F Porreca
Journal of Neuroscience, 2001Soc Neuroscience
Many clinical case reports have suggested that sustained opioid exposure can elicit
unexpected, paradoxical pain. Here, we explore the possibility that (1) opioid-induced pain
results from tonic activation of descending pain facilitation arising in the rostral ventromedial
medulla (RVM) and (2) the presence of such pain manifests behaviorally as antinociceptive
tolerance. Rats implanted subcutaneously with pellets or osmotic minipumps delivering
morphine displayed time-related tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia (ie, opioid …
Many clinical case reports have suggested that sustained opioid exposure can elicit unexpected, paradoxical pain. Here, we explore the possibility that (1) opioid-induced pain results from tonic activation of descending pain facilitation arising in the rostral ventromedial medulla (RVM) and (2) the presence of such pain manifests behaviorally as antinociceptive tolerance. Rats implanted subcutaneously with pellets or osmotic minipumps delivering morphine displayed time-related tactile allodynia and thermal hyperalgesia (i.e., opioid-induced “pain”); placebo pellets or saline minipumps did not change thresholds. Opioid-induced pain was observed while morphine delivery continued and while the rats were not in withdrawal. RVM lidocaine, or bilateral lesions of the dorsolateral funiculus (DLF), did not change response thresholds in placebo-pelleted rats but blocked opioid-induced pain. The intrathecal morphine antinociceptive dose–response curve (DRC) in morphine-pelleted rats was displaced to the right of that in placebo-pelleted rats, indicating antinociceptive “tolerance.” RVM lidocaine or bilateral DLF lesion did not alter the intrathecal morphine DRC in placebo-pelleted rats but blocked the rightward displacement seen in morphine-pelleted animals. The subcutaneous morphine antinociceptive DRC in morphine-pelleted rats was displaced to the right of that in placebo-pelleted rats; this right shift was blocked by RVM lidocaine. The data show that (1) opioids elicit pain through tonic activation of bulbospinal facilitation from the RVM, (2) increased pain decreases spinal opioid antinociceptive potency, and (3) blockade of pain restores antinociceptive potency, revealing no change in antinociceptive signal transduction. These studies offer a mechanism for paradoxical opioid-induced pain and allow the development of approaches by which the loss of analgesic activity of opioids might be inhibited.
Soc Neuroscience