[HTML][HTML] Functional crosstalk between type I and II interferon through the regulated expression of STAT1

DJ Gough, NL Messina, L Hii, JA Gould… - PLoS …, 2010 - journals.plos.org
DJ Gough, NL Messina, L Hii, JA Gould, K Sabapathy, APS Robertson, JA Trapani, DE Levy
PLoS biology, 2010journals.plos.org
Autocrine priming of cells by small quantities of constitutively produced type I interferon (IFN)
is a well-known phenomenon. In the absence of type I IFN priming, cells display attenuated
responses to other cytokines, such as anti-viral protection in response to IFNγ. This
phenomenon was proposed to be because IFNα/β receptor1 (IFNAR1) is a component of the
IFNγ receptor (IFNGR), but our new data are more consistent with a previously proposed
model indicating that regulated expression of STAT1 may also play a critical role in the …
Autocrine priming of cells by small quantities of constitutively produced type I interferon (IFN) is a well-known phenomenon. In the absence of type I IFN priming, cells display attenuated responses to other cytokines, such as anti-viral protection in response to IFNγ. This phenomenon was proposed to be because IFNα/β receptor1 (IFNAR1) is a component of the IFNγ receptor (IFNGR), but our new data are more consistent with a previously proposed model indicating that regulated expression of STAT1 may also play a critical role in the priming process. Initially, we noticed that DNA binding activity of STAT1 was attenuated in c-Jun/ fibroblasts because they expressed lower levels of STAT1 than wild-type cells. However, expression of STAT1 was rescued by culturing c-Jun/ fibroblasts in media conditioned by wild-type fibroblasts suggesting they secreted a STAT1-inducing factor. The STAT1-inducing factor in fibroblast-conditioned media was IFNβ, as it was inhibited by antibodies to IFNAR1, or when IFNβ expression was knocked down in wild-type cells. IFNAR1−/− fibroblasts, which cannot respond to this priming, also expressed reduced levels of STAT1, which correlated with their poor responses to IFNγ. The lack of priming in IFNAR1−/− fibroblasts was compensated by over-expression of STAT1, which rescued molecular responses to IFNγ and restored the ability of IFNγ to induce protective anti-viral immunity. This study provides a comprehensive description of the molecular events involved in priming by type I IFN. Adding to the previous working model that proposed an interaction between type I and II IFN receptors, our work and that of others demonstrates that type I IFN primes IFNγ-mediated immune responses by regulating expression of STAT1. This may also explain how type I IFN can additionally prime cells to respond to a range of other cytokines that use STAT1 (e.g., IL-6, M-CSF, IL-10) and suggests a potential mechanism for the changing levels of STAT1 expression observed during viral infection.
PLOS