Suppressor cell activity in a randomized trial of patients receiving active specific immunotherapy with melanoma cell vaccine and low dosages of cyclophosphamide

DSB Hoon, LJ Foshag, AS Nizze, R Bohman… - Cancer research, 1990 - AACR
DSB Hoon, LJ Foshag, AS Nizze, R Bohman, DL Morton
Cancer research, 1990AACR
Previous studies have shown that melanoma patients develop an immune response to cell
surface melanoma-associated antigens. The presence of this antibody response to cell
surface antigens has been correlated with a better clinical outcome when melanoma
patients are treated with an allogeneic melanoma cell vaccine (MCV) as an active
immunotherapy protocol. It was hypothesized that the inability to consistently induce or
enhance existing immune responses to melanoma-associated antigens was related to the …
Abstract
Previous studies have shown that melanoma patients develop an immune response to cell surface melanoma-associated antigens. The presence of this antibody response to cell surface antigens has been correlated with a better clinical outcome when melanoma patients are treated with an allogeneic melanoma cell vaccine (MCV) as an active immunotherapy protocol. It was hypothesized that the inability to consistently induce or enhance existing immune responses to melanoma-associated antigens was related to the downregulation by suppressor cells. Patients received treatments of MCV 3 times in a 4-week interval and then every fourth week. The biological response modifier cyclophosphamide (CYP) is an immunomodulator of suppressor T-cell function. In this study we set out to determine whether CYP given prior to MCV could reduce suppressor cell activity during vaccination. In a randomized trial stage II and III melanoma patients (n = 41) were given MCV alone or in conjunction with CYP at dosages of 300, 150, or 75 mg/m2. CYP was given 3 days prior to each MCV treatment. Suppressor cell activity in patients was monitored by a concanavalin A suppressor assay using peripheral blood lymphocytes from serial phlebotomies during a 12-week period of treatment. In each trial group there were patients who had major reduction in suppressor cell activity (>50%). Overall, the greatest reduction in suppressor cell activity occurred in patients receiving 300 mg/m2 CYP compared to the other CYP dosages or MCV alone. For the first two treatments at all CYP dosages there was a greater number of patients showing reduced suppressor cell activity compared to later treatments. In a comparison of patients receiving MCV alone to MCV + CYP 300 mg/m2 phenotypic analysis of lymphocyte subsets showed significant (P = 0.03) reduction in the CD8+CD11B+ (suppressor) cells of the latter group. These studies suggest that CYP can be used at low dosages in conjunction with MCV to reduce suppressor cell activity.
AACR