Calmodulin-binding domain of AS160 regulates contraction-but not insulin-stimulated glucose uptake in skeletal muscle

HF Kramer, EB Taylor, CA Witczak, N Fujii… - Diabetes, 2007 - Am Diabetes Assoc
HF Kramer, EB Taylor, CA Witczak, N Fujii, MF Hirshman, LJ Goodyear
Diabetes, 2007Am Diabetes Assoc
OBJECTIVE—Insulin and contraction increase skeletal muscle glucose uptake through
distinct and additive mechanisms. However, recent reports have demonstrated that both
signals converge on the Akt substrate of 160 kDa (AS160), a protein that regulates GLUT4
translocation. Although AS160 phosphorylation is believed to be the primary factor affecting
its activity, AS160 also possesses a calmodulin-binding domain (CBD). This raises the
possibility that contraction-stimulated increases in Ca2+/calmodulin could also modulate …
OBJECTIVE—Insulin and contraction increase skeletal muscle glucose uptake through distinct and additive mechanisms. However, recent reports have demonstrated that both signals converge on the Akt substrate of 160 kDa (AS160), a protein that regulates GLUT4 translocation. Although AS160 phosphorylation is believed to be the primary factor affecting its activity, AS160 also possesses a calmodulin-binding domain (CBD). This raises the possibility that contraction-stimulated increases in Ca2+/calmodulin could also modulate AS160 function.
RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS—To evaluate the AS160 CBD in skeletal muscle, empty-vector, wild-type, or CBD-mutant AS160 cDNAs were injected into mouse muscles followed by in vivo electroporation. One week later, AS160 was overexpressed by ∼14-fold over endogenous protein.
RESULTS—Immunoprecipitates of wild-type and CBD-mutant AS160 were incubated with biotinylated calmodulin in the presence of Ca2+. Wild-type AS160, but not the CBD-mutant AS160, associated with calmodulin. Next, we measured insulin- and contraction-stimulated glucose uptake in vivo. Compared with empty-vector and wild-type AS160, insulin-stimulated glucose uptake was not altered in muscles expressing CBD-mutant AS160. In contrast, contraction-stimulated glucose uptake was significantly decreased in CBD-mutant–expressing muscles. This inhibitory effect on glucose uptake was not associated with aberrant contraction-stimulated AS160 phosphorylation. Interestingly, AS160 expressing both calmodulin-binding and Rab-GAP (GTPase-activating protein) domain point mutations (CBD + R/K) fully restored contraction-stimulated glucose uptake.
CONCLUSIONS—Our results suggest that the AS160 CBD directly regulates contraction-induced glucose uptake in mouse muscle and that calmodulin provides an additional means of modulating AS160 Rab-GAP function independent of phosphorylation. These findings define a novel AS160 signaling component, unique to contraction and not insulin, leading to glucose uptake in skeletal muscle.
Am Diabetes Assoc