[HTML][HTML] Inflammatory markers and the risk of coronary heart disease in men and women

JK Pai, T Pischon, J Ma, JAE Manson… - … England Journal of …, 2004 - Mass Medical Soc
JK Pai, T Pischon, J Ma, JAE Manson, SE Hankinson, K Joshipura, GC Curhan, N Rifai…
New England Journal of Medicine, 2004Mass Medical Soc
Background Few studies have simultaneously investigated the role of soluble tumor
necrosis factor α (TNF-α) receptors types 1 and 2 (sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2), C-reactive
protein, and interleukin-6 as predictors of cardiovascular events. The value of these
inflammatory markers as independent predictors remains controversial. Methods We
examined plasma levels of sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein as
markers of risk for coronary heart disease among women participating in the Nurses' Health …
Background
Few studies have simultaneously investigated the role of soluble tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) receptors types 1 and 2 (sTNF-R1 and sTNF-R2), C-reactive protein, and interleukin-6 as predictors of cardiovascular events. The value of these inflammatory markers as independent predictors remains controversial.
Methods
We examined plasma levels of sTNF-R1, sTNF-R2, interleukin-6, and C-reactive protein as markers of risk for coronary heart disease among women participating in the Nurses' Health Study and men participating in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study in nested case–control analyses. Among participants who provided a blood sample and who were free of cardiovascular disease at baseline, 239 women and 265 men had a nonfatal myocardial infarction or fatal coronary heart disease during eight years and six years of follow-up, respectively. Using risk-set sampling, we selected controls in a 2:1 ratio with matching for age, smoking status, and date of blood sampling.
Results
After adjustment for matching factors, high levels of interleukin-6 and C-reactive protein were significantly related to an increased risk of coronary heart disease in both sexes, whereas high levels of soluble TNF-α receptors were significant only among women. Further adjustment for lipid and nonlipid factors attenuated all associations; only C-reactive protein levels remained significant. The relative risk among all participants was 1.79 for those with C-reactive protein levels of at least 3.0 mg per liter, as compared with those with levels of less than 1.0 mg per liter (95 percent confidence interval, 1.27 to 2.51; P for trend <0.001). Additional adjustment for the presence or absence of diabetes and hypertension moderately attenuated the relative risk to 1.68 (95 percent confidence interval, 1.18 to 2.38; P for trend = 0.008).
Conclusions
Elevated levels of inflammatory markers, particularly C-reactive protein, indicate an increased risk of coronary heart disease. Although plasma lipid levels were more strongly associated with an increased risk than were inflammatory markers, the level of C-reactive protein remained a significant contributor to the prediction of coronary heart disease.
The New England Journal Of Medicine