A re-appraisal of the skin-sensitizing activity of 2, 4-dinitrothiocyanobenzene

RJ Dearman, M Cumberbatch, J Hilton… - Food and chemical …, 1997 - Elsevier
RJ Dearman, M Cumberbatch, J Hilton, I Fielding, DA Basketter, I Kimber
Food and chemical toxicology, 1997Elsevier
A debate continues regarding the immunological properties of 2, 4-dinitrothiocyanobenzene
(DNTB). In some investigations this chemical was shown not to cause skin sensitization
when applied topically but to induce instead hyporesponsiveness or immunological
tolerance. In other studies DNTB was found to pause skin sensitization, but not tolerance.
However, this chemical continues to be used to discriminate between the properties of skin
sensitizing and non-sensitizing chemicals. This study demonstrates that topical exposure of …
A debate continues regarding the immunological properties of 2,4-dinitrothiocyanobenzene (DNTB). In some investigations this chemical was shown not to cause skin sensitization when applied topically but to induce instead hyporesponsiveness or immunological tolerance. In other studies DNTB was found to pause skin sensitization, but not tolerance. However, this chemical continues to be used to discriminate between the properties of skin sensitizing and non-sensitizing chemicals. This study demonstrates that topical exposure of mice to DNTB induces skin sensitization in mice and that this is associated with the accumulation of dendritic cells in draining lymph nodes and the stimulation of lymph node cell proliferation; the latter responses being of equivalent magnitude to those stimulated by 2,4-dinitrochlorobenzene (DNCB), a chemical known to cause contact sensitization. Moreover, exposure of mice to DNTB, as with exposure to DNCB, resulted in the development of a cytokine secretion pattern by draining lymph node cells (LNC) characteristic of contact allergens. Thus, DNTB and DNCB each induced the production by LNC of high levels of interferon-y, but little or no interleukin 4 or interleukin 10. Finally, DNTB was shown in the guinea pig maximization test to behave as an extreme skin sensitizer. These results confirm that DNTB should not be regarded as a universal tolerogen and that it possesses a significant potential to induce contact sensitization. The use of this chemical as a presumptive non-sensitizer and/or tolerogen for the evaluation of the selectivity of new predictive test methods for the identification of contact allergens is therefore considered to be inappropriate.
Elsevier