Improved diagnostic evaluation of suspected tuberculosis

DPS Dosanjh, TSC Hinks, JA Innes… - Annals of internal …, 2008 - acpjournals.org
DPS Dosanjh, TSC Hinks, JA Innes, JJ Deeks, G Pasvol, S Hackforth, H Varia, KA Millington…
Annals of internal medicine, 2008acpjournals.org
Background: The role of new T-cell–based blood tests for tuberculosis in the diagnosis of
active tuberculosis is unclear. Objective: To compare the performance of 2 interferon-γ
assays and tuberculin skin testing in adults with suspected tuberculosis. Design: Prospective
study conducted in routine practice. Setting: 2 urban hospitals in the United Kingdom.
Patients: 389 adults, predominantly of South Asian and black ethnicity, with moderate to high
clinical suspicion of active tuberculosis. Intervention: Tuberculin skin testing, the enzyme …
Background
The role of new T-cell–based blood tests for tuberculosis in the diagnosis of active tuberculosis is unclear.
Objective
To compare the performance of 2 interferon-γ assays and tuberculin skin testing in adults with suspected tuberculosis.
Design
Prospective study conducted in routine practice.
Setting
2 urban hospitals in the United Kingdom.
Patients
389 adults, predominantly of South Asian and black ethnicity, with moderate to high clinical suspicion of active tuberculosis.
Intervention
Tuberculin skin testing, the enzyme-linked immunospot assay (ELISpot) incorporating early secretory antigenic target-6 and culture filtrate protein-10 (standard ELISpot), and ELISpot incorporating a novel antigen, Rv3879c (ELISpotPLUS) were performed during diagnostic assessment by independent persons who were blinded to results of the other test.
Measurements
Sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and likelihood ratios.
Results
194 patients had a final diagnosis of active tuberculosis, of which 79% were culture-confirmed. Sensitivity for culture confirmed and highly probable tuberculosis was 89% (95% CI, 84% to 93%) with ELISpotPLUS, 85% (CI, 79% to 90%) with standard ELISpot, 79% (CI, 72% to 85%) with 15-mm threshold tuberculin skin testing, and 83% (CI, 77% to 89%) with stratified thresholds of 15 and 10 mm in vaccinated and unvaccinated patients, respectively. The ELISpotPLUS assay was more sensitive than tuberculin skin testing with 15-mm cutoff points (P = 0.01) but not with stratified cutoff points (P = 0.10). The ELISpotPLUS assay had 4% higher diagnostic sensitivity than standard ELISpot (P = 0.02). Combined sensitivity of ELISpotPLUS and tuberculin skin testing was 99% (CI, 95% to 100%), conferring a negative likelihood ratio of 0.02 (CI, 0 to 0.06) when both test results were negative.
Limitations
Local standards for tuberculin skin testing differed from others used internationally. The study sample included few immunosuppressed patients.
Conclusion
The ELISpotPLUS assay is more sensitive than standard ELISpot and, when used in combination with tuberculin skin testing, enables rapid exclusion of active infection in patients with moderate to high pretest probability of tuberculosis.
acpjournals.org