Altered cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio of survivin is a prognostic indicator in breast cancer

DJ Brennan, E Rexhepaj, SL O'Brien, E McSherry… - Clinical Cancer …, 2008 - AACR
DJ Brennan, E Rexhepaj, SL O'Brien, E McSherry, DP O'Connor, A Fagan, AC Culhane
Clinical Cancer Research, 2008AACR
Abstract Purpose: Survivin (BIRC5) is a promising tumor biomarker. Conflicting data exist on
its prognostic effect in breast cancer. These data may at least be partly due to the manual
interpretation of immunohistochemical staining, especially as survivin can be located in both
the nucleus and cytoplasm. Quantitative determination of survivin expression using image
analysis offers the opportunity to develop alternative scoring models for survivin
immunohistochemistry. Here, we present such a model. Experimental Design: A breast …
Abstract
Purpose: Survivin (BIRC5) is a promising tumor biomarker. Conflicting data exist on its prognostic effect in breast cancer. These data may at least be partly due to the manual interpretation of immunohistochemical staining, especially as survivin can be located in both the nucleus and cytoplasm. Quantitative determination of survivin expression using image analysis offers the opportunity to develop alternative scoring models for survivin immunohistochemistry. Here, we present such a model.
Experimental Design: A breast cancer tissue microarray containing 102 tumors was stained with an anti-survivin antibody. Whole-slide scanning was used to capture high-resolution images. These images were analyzed using automated algorithms to quantify the staining.
Results: Increased nuclear, but not cytoplasmic, survivin was associated with a reduced overall survival (OS; P = 0.038) and disease-specific survival (P = 0.0015). A high cytoplasmic-to-nuclear ratio (CNR) of survivin was associated with improved OS (P = 0.005) and disease-specific survival (P = 0.05). Multivariate analysis revealed that the survivin CNR was an independent predictor of OS (hazard ratio, 0.09; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.76; P = 0.027). A survivin CNR of >5 correlated positively with estrogen receptor (P = 0.019) and progesterone receptor (P = 0.033) levels, whereas it was negatively associated with Ki-67 expression (P = 0.04), p53 status (P = 0.005), and c-myc amplification (P = 0.016).
Conclusion: Different prognostic information is supplied by nuclear and cytoplasmic survivin in breast cancer. Nuclear survivin is a poor prognostic marker in breast cancer. Moreover, CNR of survivin, as determined by image analysis, is an independent prognostic factor.
AACR